Suppr超能文献

复杂头皮和额部恶性肿瘤切除术后的显微外科重建:一种治疗算法的美学和肿瘤学结果。

Aesthetic and oncologic outcome after microsurgical reconstruction of complex scalp and forehead defects after malignant tumor resection: an algorithm for treatment.

机构信息

Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Seattle, Wash. From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center; the Department Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University Health Network; and the Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):460-470. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de2260.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited follow-up data on aesthetic outcome and survival after microsurgical reconstruction of complex scalp and forehead defects are available. These data are important to improve reconstruction quality and patient counseling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical, aesthetic, and oncologic outcome of free flap scalp and forehead reconstructions in the patient population of two academic centers.

METHODS

Retrospective data analysis of patients with a microsurgical reconstruction of the scalp or forehead between January of 1999 and June of 2008 was performed. Aesthetic outcome was assessed on a five-point Likert scale for flap color match, contour, and overall aesthetic result.

RESULTS

The group consisted of 84 patients with a mean follow-up time of 27 months (range, 1 to 95 months). Mean defect size was 134 cm (range, 20 to 340 cm), with 46 percent full-thickness bone defects and 16 percent dura defects. The most commonly used free flaps were latissimus dorsi (n = 34) and anterolateral thigh (n = 24). Total flap failure occurred in five patients (6 percent). Disease-free survival and overall survival rates at 5 years were 57 and 65 percent, respectively. Additional operations for aesthetic reasons were performed in 19 patients (23 percent). Panel scores showed a significant lower satisfaction with reconstruction of defects that were located over the frontal scalp compared with other locations (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical reconstruction in complex scalp and forehead defects is a safe procedure. From the authors' experience, they suggest an algorithm for reconstruction of these complex reconstructive defects that will most likely result in the best aesthetic result.

摘要

背景

关于复杂头皮和前额缺损的显微重建后美观效果和生存的随访数据有限。这些数据对于提高重建质量和患者咨询非常重要。本研究的目的是评估两个学术中心患者人群中游离皮瓣头皮和前额重建的手术、美观和肿瘤学结果。

方法

对 1999 年 1 月至 2008 年 6 月间进行头皮或前额显微重建的患者进行回顾性数据分析。使用五点 Likert 量表评估皮瓣颜色匹配、轮廓和整体美观效果。

结果

该组包括 84 例患者,平均随访时间为 27 个月(范围为 1 至 95 个月)。平均缺损大小为 134cm(范围为 20 至 340cm),其中 46%为全层骨缺损,16%为硬脑膜缺损。最常使用的游离皮瓣为背阔肌(n=34)和股前外侧皮瓣(n=24)。共有 5 例患者(6%)发生总皮瓣失败。5 年无病生存率和总生存率分别为 57%和 65%。19 例患者(23%)因美观原因进行了额外手术。面板评分显示,位于额头皮下的缺损重建满意度明显低于其他位置(p=0.004)。

结论

复杂头皮和前额缺损的显微重建是一种安全的手术。根据作者的经验,他们建议采用一种重建这些复杂重建缺陷的算法,这很可能会产生最佳的美观效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验