• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predicting treatment effects using biomarker data in a meta-analysis of clinical trials.使用临床试验荟萃分析中的生物标志物数据预测治疗效果。
Stat Med. 2010 Aug 15;29(18):1875-89. doi: 10.1002/sim.3931.
2
A shrinkage approach for estimating a treatment effect using intermediate biomarker data in clinical trials.一种在临床试验中使用中间生物标志物数据估计治疗效果的收缩方法。
Biometrics. 2011 Dec;67(4):1434-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01608.x. Epub 2011 May 31.
3
A Bayesian prediction model between a biomarker and the clinical endpoint for dichotomous variables.二分类变量生物标志物与临床终点之间的贝叶斯预测模型。
Trials. 2014 Dec 20;15:500. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-500.
4
Five criteria for using a surrogate endpoint to predict treatment effect based on data from multiple previous trials.基于多个先前试验数据,使用替代终点预测治疗效果的 5 项标准。
Stat Med. 2018 Feb 20;37(4):507-518. doi: 10.1002/sim.7561. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
5
Exploring the relationship between the causal-inference and meta-analytic paradigms for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints.探索因果推断与荟萃分析范式在替代终点评估中的关系。
Stat Med. 2016 Apr 15;35(8):1281-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.6807. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
6
Evaluating a surrogate endpoint at three levels, with application to vaccine development.在三个层面评估替代终点及其在疫苗研发中的应用。
Stat Med. 2008 Oct 15;27(23):4758-78. doi: 10.1002/sim.3122.
7
Does the decision in a validation process of a surrogate endpoint change with level of significance of treatment effect? A proposal on validation of surrogate endpoints.替代终点验证过程中的决策是否会随治疗效果的显著性水平而改变?关于替代终点验证的一项提议。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Jan;30(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.08.006. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
8
A bayesian approach to surrogacy assessment using principal stratification in clinical trials.在临床试验中使用主分层的贝叶斯代孕评估方法。
Biometrics. 2010 Jun;66(2):523-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01303.x. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
9
A reflection on the causal interpretation of individual-level surrogacy.关于个体层面代孕因果解释的思考。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(3):529-540. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1579221. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
10
A unified framework for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in mental-health clinical trials.用于精神健康临床试验中替代终点评估的统一框架。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2010 Jun;19(3):205-36. doi: 10.1177/0962280209105015. Epub 2009 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Event-Free Survival, a Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Composite End Point, Is Not a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation.无事件生存,一种基于前列腺特异性抗原的复合终点,不能替代局部前列腺癌男性接受放疗后的总生存。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):3032-3041. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03114. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
Translating neoadjuvant therapy into survival benefits: one size does not fit all.将新辅助治疗转化为生存获益:一刀切并不适用。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;13(9):566-79. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.35. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
3
Surrogacy marker paradox measures in meta-analytic settings.荟萃分析环境中的替代标志物悖论测量
Biostatistics. 2015 Apr;16(2):400-12. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu043. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
4
A unified procedure for meta-analytic evaluation of surrogate end points in randomized clinical trials.用于随机临床试验替代终点的荟萃分析评估的统一程序。
Biostatistics. 2012 Sep;13(4):609-24. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxs003. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
5
Meta-analysis for surrogacy: accelerated failure time models and semicompeting risks modeling.代孕的荟萃分析:加速失效时间模型和半竞争风险建模。
Biometrics. 2012 Mar;68(1):226-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01633.x. Epub 2011 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival analysis using auxiliary variables via non-parametric multiple imputation.通过非参数多重填补法使用辅助变量进行生存分析。
Stat Med. 2006 Oct 30;25(20):3503-17. doi: 10.1002/sim.2452.
2
A perfect correlate does not a surrogate make.具有完美相关性的事物并非就可成为替代物。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Sep 9;3:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-16.
3
The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments.随机试验荟萃分析中替代终点的验证
Biostatistics. 2000 Mar;1(1):49-67. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.1.49.
4
On meta-analytic assessment of surrogate outcomes.关于替代结局的荟萃分析评估。
Biostatistics. 2000 Sep;1(3):231-46. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.231.
5
A measure of the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.由替代标志物解释的治疗效果比例的一种度量。
Biometrics. 2002 Dec;58(4):803-12. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00803.x.
6
Properties of a nonparametric test for early comparison of treatments in clinical trials in the presence of surrogate endpoints.在存在替代终点的情况下,用于临床试验中治疗早期比较的非参数检验的性质。
Biometrics. 1999 Dec;55(4):1171-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.01171.x.
7
The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients.协作性青光眼初始治疗研究:研究设计、方法及入组患者的基线特征
Ophthalmology. 1999 Apr;106(4):653-62. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90147-1.
8
An evaluation of a measure of the proportion of the treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.对由替代标志物解释的治疗效果比例的一种测量方法的评估。
Control Clin Trials. 1998 Dec;19(6):555-68. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00039-7.
9
Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments.随机试验中替代终点验证的标准。
Biometrics. 1998 Sep;54(3):1014-29.
10
Estimating the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.估计由替代标志物解释的治疗效果比例。
Stat Med. 1997 Jul 15;16(13):1515-27. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970715)16:13<1515::aid-sim572>3.0.co;2-1.

使用临床试验荟萃分析中的生物标志物数据预测治疗效果。

Predicting treatment effects using biomarker data in a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2010 Aug 15;29(18):1875-89. doi: 10.1002/sim.3931.

DOI:10.1002/sim.3931
PMID:20680981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4153610/
Abstract

A biomarker (S) measured after randomization in a clinical trial can often provide information about the true endpoint (T) and hence the effect of treatment (Z). It can usually be measured earlier and more easily than T and as such may be useful to shorten the trial length. A potential use of S is to completely replace T as a surrogate endpoint to evaluate whether the treatment is effective. Another potential use of S is to serve as an auxiliary variable to help provide information and improve the inference on the treatment effect prediction when T is not completely observed. The objective of this report is to focus on its role as an auxiliary variable and to identify situations when S can be useful to increase efficiency in predicting the treatment effect in a new trial in a multiple-trial setting. Both S and T are continuous. We find that higher efficiency gain is associated with higher trial-level correlation but not individual-level correlation when only S, but not T is measured in a new trial; but, the amount of information recovery from S is usually negligible. However, when T is partially observed in the new trial and the individual-level correlation is relatively high, there is substantial efficiency gain by using S. For design purposes, our results suggest that it is often important to collect markers that have high adjusted individual-level correlation with T and at least a small amount of data on T. The results are illustrated using simulations and an example from a glaucoma clinical trial.

摘要

生物标志物 (S) 在临床试验随机分组后测量,通常可以提供关于真实终点 (T) 的信息,从而可以评估治疗效果 (Z)。S 通常可以更早、更容易地测量,因此可能有助于缩短试验的长度。S 的一个潜在用途是完全替代 T 作为替代终点,以评估治疗是否有效。S 的另一个潜在用途是作为辅助变量,有助于提供信息并提高 T 未完全观察时对治疗效果预测的推断。本报告的目的是重点关注其作为辅助变量的作用,并确定在多试验环境中,当 T 未完全观察时,S 可以在新试验中提高预测治疗效果的效率的情况。S 和 T 均为连续变量。我们发现,当仅在新试验中测量 S 而不是 T 时,与仅测量 T 相比,更高的效率增益与更高的试验水平相关性相关,但与个体水平相关性无关;但是,从 S 中恢复的信息量通常可以忽略不计。然而,当新试验中部分观察到 T 且个体水平相关性较高时,使用 S 可带来实质性的效率增益。出于设计目的,我们的结果表明,收集与 T 具有高调整个体水平相关性且至少有少量 T 数据的标志物通常很重要。模拟结果和青光眼临床试验的实例说明了这些结果。