Spending limited health care dollars on what works best: the promise of comparative effectiveness research.
作者信息
Stein Josh
机构信息
North Carolina State Senate, USA.
出版信息
N C Med J. 2010 May-Jun;71(3):265-6.
PMID:20681501
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Spending limited health care dollars on what works best: the promise of comparative effectiveness research.
N C Med J. 2010 May-Jun;71(3):265-6.
2
Comparative effectiveness research in the era of health reform.
N C Med J. 2010 May-Jun;71(3):263-7.
3
Comments on 'Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure'.
Stat Med. 2010 Aug 30;29(19):1989-90; discussion 1996-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.3926.
4
Science and the stiumulus. Medicine under the microscope.
Science. 2009 Nov 27;326(5957):1183-5. doi: 10.1126/science.326.5957.1183.
5
US healthcare reform: implications for health economics and outcomes research.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Jun;10(3):215-6. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.32.
6
The relevance of international studies to informed pharmacoeconomics and health policy decisions.
Clin Ther. 2010 Jan;32(1):106-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.01.023.
7
Health reform's effect on school-based health centers.
N C Med J. 2010 May-Jun;71(3):247.
8
The promise and future of comparative effectiveness research.
J Nurs Care Qual. 2010 Jan-Mar;25(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3181c105b7.
9
Information technology reform IS health reform.
N C Med J. 2010 May-Jun;71(3):254-8.
10
An evaluation of recent federal spending on comparative effectiveness research: priorities, gaps, and next steps.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1768-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0687.
Zotero 插件