Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York 10022, USA.
Retina. 2010 Oct;30(9):1376-85. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181dcfb0b.
The purpose of this study was to investigate if monthly intravitreal ranibizumab decreases risk of macular hemorrhages in patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration.
Incidences of macular hemorrhages in the control and ranibizumab groups from three, multicenter, randomized, clinical trials (MARINA, ANCHOR, and PIER) were compared. Two time intervals (Months 0-3 and 5-17) were evaluated to account for transition from monthly to quarterly injections in PIER. Time interval after Month 17 was excluded because of crossover from control to active treatment in all trials.
Months 0-3: All trials showed higher incidence rates of hemorrhages in control compared with ranibizumab groups (ANCHOR: photodynamic therapy [27.3%], 0.3 mg [8.0%], 0.5 mg [8.6%]; MARINA: sham [18.6%], 0.3 mg [8.8%], 0.5 mg [8.8%]; and PIER: sham [16.1%], 0.3 mg [3.4%], 0.5 mg [3.3%]). In ANCHOR and MARINA, data of Months 5-17 showed higher incidence rates in control compared with monthly ranibizumab groups (ANCHOR: photodynamic therapy [47.8%], 0.3 mg [12.5%], 0.5 mg [12.3%]; and MARINA: sham [38.0%], 0.3 mg [13.2%], 0.5 mg [13.0%]), but this was not seen for quarterly ranibizumab groups in PIER (sham [22.4%], 0.3 mg [23.7%], 0.5 mg [28.3%]).
Treatment with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab was associated with reduced risk of new macular hemorrhages when compared with photodynamic therapy (ANCHOR) or sham (MARINA and PIER). There was no difference between PIER quarterly ranibizumab-treated and sham patients.
本研究旨在探讨每月玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗是否会降低年龄相关性黄斑变性继发脉络膜新生血管患者黄斑出血的风险。
比较三个多中心、随机、临床试验(MARINA、ANCHOR 和 PIER)中对照组和雷珠单抗组的黄斑出血发生率。评估了两个时间间隔(0-3 个月和 5-17 个月),以考虑 PIER 中从每月注射过渡到每季度注射。由于所有试验均从对照组转为活性治疗,因此排除了 17 个月后的时间间隔。
0-3 个月:所有试验均显示对照组的出血发生率高于雷珠单抗组(ANCHOR:光动力疗法 [27.3%],0.3mg [8.0%],0.5mg [8.6%];MARINA:假手术 [18.6%],0.3mg [8.8%],0.5mg [8.8%];和 PIER:假手术 [16.1%],0.3mg [3.4%],0.5mg [3.3%])。在 ANCHOR 和 MARINA 中,5-17 个月的数据显示对照组的出血发生率高于每月雷珠单抗组(ANCHOR:光动力疗法 [47.8%],0.3mg [12.5%],0.5mg [12.3%];MARINA:假手术 [38.0%],0.3mg [13.2%],0.5mg [13.0%]),但在 PIER 中,每季度雷珠单抗组并未出现这种情况(假手术 [22.4%],0.3mg [23.7%],0.5mg [28.3%])。
与光动力疗法(ANCHOR)或假手术(MARINA 和 PIER)相比,每月玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗与新发黄斑出血风险降低相关。PIER 中每季度雷珠单抗治疗与假手术患者之间无差异。