Suppr超能文献

随机、开放标签、平行组评估:对于起始胰岛素治疗控制不佳且继续使用口服降糖药的 2 型糖尿病患者,基础-餐时胰岛素治疗与赖脯胰岛素预混治疗的疗效比较:DURABLE 试验的一项非劣效性强化亚研究。

Randomized, open-label, parallel-group evaluations of basal-bolus therapy versus insulin lispro premixed therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing to achieve control with starter insulin treatment and continuing oral antihyperglycemic drugs: a noninferiority intensification substudy of the DURABLE trial.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43201, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):896-908. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.05.001.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insulin glargine and lispro mix 75/25 (75% insulin lispro protamine suspension and 25% insulin lispro injection [LM75/25]) represent 2 common starter insulin regimen classes: basal and premixed. After initiation of starter insulin therapy, if patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are unable to achieve a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level <7.0%, insulin intensification may be indicated. The DURABLE (Assessing Durability of Basal Versus Lispro Mix 75/25 Insulin Efficacy) trial was designed to compare initiating insulin therapy with analogue basal insulin versus premixed analogue insulin in patients unable to achieve good glycemic control while taking multiple oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).

OBJECTIVE

To provide objective information about insulin intensification, the DURABLE trial also included a substudy evaluating a systematic approach to advancing insulin therapy in those patients who did not achieve glycemic control with their initial insulin regimen. This substudy, the results of which are reported here, tested the hypothesis that advancing insulin therapy with premixed insulin is noninferior to basal-bolus therapy (BBT) in patients with type 2 DM unable to achieve an HbA1c level < or = 7.0% after 6 months of starter insulin therapy.

METHODS

In the main DURABLE study, 2091 patients (age range, 30-80 years) with type 2 DM and HbA1c values >7.0% receiving > or = 2 OADs were randomized to receive insulin glargine (n = 1046) or LM75/25 (n = 1045), both in combination with prestudy OADs. After 6 months, patients with HbA1c levels >7.0% could enter this intensification substudy; OADs except sulfonylureas were continued. Patients originally receiving insulin glargine were enrolled in intensification arm A and were randomized to receive BBT (insulin glargine once daily plus mealtime insulin lispro TID) or LM75/25 BID. Patients originally receiving LM75/25 were enrolled in intensification arm B and randomized to receive BBT or mealtime 50% insulin lispro protamine suspension and 50% insulin lispro injection (LM50/50) TID. Insulin doses were adjusted based on preprandial plasma glucose levels. The primary end point was noninferiority of premixed therapy versus BBT with respect to end-point HbA1c. Secondary end points included change in HbA1c and weight, percentage of patients reaching HbA1c target levels, total daily insulin dose, and rates of hypoglycemia. The safety profile was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 475 patients in the insulin glargine + OAD arm of the main study who had HbA1c levels >7.0% at 6 months, 399 (84%) entered intensification arm A. The mean age was 57 years, 53% of the patients were male, and mean (SD) HbA1c was 8.0% (1.0%) at baseline. Of those patients, 199 were randomly assigned to receive BBT and 200 were assigned to receive LM75/25. Of the 411 patients in the LM75/25 + OAD arm of the main study who had an HbA1c level >7.0% at 6 months, 345 (84%) entered intensification arm B. The mean age was 55 years, 51% of the patients were male, and mean (SD) HbA1c was 8.0% (0.9%) at baseline. Of those patients, 171 were randomly assigned to receive BBT and 174 were assigned to receive LM50/50. At end point, noninferiority of LM75/25 or LM50/50 to BBT was supported, with a 95% CI of -0.10 to 0.37 and -0.25 to 0.25, respectively. At 6 months, HbA1c did not differ significantly from baseline in any group. Regardless of treatment group, <20% of patients achieved an HbA1c level <7.0%. There were no significant differences between groups in total daily insulin dose, weight gain, incidence or rate of hypoglycemia, or incidence of serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

No group had significant improvement from baseline in HbA1c. Our study results suggest that premixed therapy, dosed 2 times per day (LM75/25) or 3 times per day (LM50/50), was noninferior to BBT (4 injections/d) in this population of adult patients with type 2 DM previously uncontrolled with OADs plus basal insulin or twice-daily premixed insulin. Clinical-Trials.gov identifier: NCT00279201.

摘要

背景

胰岛素 glargine 和 lispro 混合 75/25(75%胰岛素 lispro 鱼精蛋白混悬液和 25%胰岛素 lispro 注射液[LM75/25])代表了两种常见的起始胰岛素治疗类别:基础胰岛素和预混胰岛素。在起始胰岛素治疗后,如果 2 型糖尿病(DM)患者无法达到糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)<7.0%,可能需要进行胰岛素强化治疗。DURABLE(评估基础胰岛素与 Lispro 混合 75/25 胰岛素疗效的持久性)试验旨在比较起始胰岛素治疗时使用模拟基础胰岛素与预混模拟胰岛素在接受多种口服抗高血糖药物(OAD)治疗但血糖控制不佳的患者中的疗效。

目的

为了提供胰岛素强化治疗的客观信息,DURABLE 试验还包括了一项亚研究,评估了在初始胰岛素治疗方案未能控制血糖的患者中,系统推进胰岛素治疗的方法。这项亚研究,其结果在此报告,检验了以下假设:在接受 OAD 联合基础胰岛素治疗的 2 型 DM 患者中,经过 6 个月的起始胰岛素治疗后,HbA1c 仍未达到<7.0%的患者,使用预混胰岛素治疗不会劣于基础-餐时胰岛素治疗(BBT)。

方法

在主要的 DURABLE 研究中,2091 名年龄在 30-80 岁之间、HbA1c 值>7.0%且正在服用≥2 种 OAD 的 2 型 DM 患者被随机分为接受胰岛素 glargine(n=1046)或 LM75/25(n=1045)治疗,两种药物均联合使用预研 OAD。6 个月后,HbA1c 值仍>7.0%的患者可进入强化治疗亚研究;除磺酰脲类药物外,OAD 继续使用。最初接受胰岛素 glargine 治疗的患者被纳入强化治疗臂 A,并随机分为接受 BBT(每日一次胰岛素 glargine 加三餐时胰岛素 lispro TID)或 LM75/25 BID。最初接受 LM75/25 治疗的患者被纳入强化治疗臂 B,并随机分为接受 BBT 或三餐时 50%胰岛素 lispro 鱼精蛋白混悬液和 50%胰岛素 lispro 注射液(LM50/50)TID。根据餐前血糖水平调整胰岛素剂量。主要终点是预混治疗与 BBT 相比在终点 HbA1c 上的非劣效性。次要终点包括 HbA1c 和体重的变化、达到 HbA1c 目标水平的患者比例、每日总胰岛素剂量和低血糖发生率。还评估了安全性。

结果

在主要研究中,接受胰岛素 glargine+OAD 治疗的 2091 名患者中有 475 名患者在 6 个月时 HbA1c 值>7.0%,其中 399 名(84%)进入强化治疗臂 A。平均年龄为 57 岁,53%的患者为男性,基线时平均(SD)HbA1c 为 8.0%(1.0%)。其中 199 名患者随机接受 BBT 治疗,200 名患者接受 LM75/25 治疗。在主要研究中,接受 LM75/25+OAD 治疗的 2091 名患者中有 411 名患者在 6 个月时 HbA1c 值>7.0%,其中 345 名(84%)进入强化治疗臂 B。平均年龄为 55 岁,51%的患者为男性,基线时平均(SD)HbA1c 为 8.0%(0.9%)。其中 171 名患者随机接受 BBT 治疗,174 名患者接受 LM50/50 治疗。在终点时,LM75/25 或 LM50/50 与 BBT 相比的非劣效性得到支持,95%置信区间分别为-0.10 至 0.37 和-0.25 至 0.25。在 6 个月时,各组的 HbA1c 与基线相比无显著差异。无论治疗组如何,<20%的患者达到 HbA1c<7.0%的目标水平。各组之间的每日总胰岛素剂量、体重增加、低血糖发生率或发生率以及严重不良事件发生率均无显著差异。

结论

各组患者的 HbA1c 均无显著改善。我们的研究结果表明,在先前接受 OAD 联合基础胰岛素或每日两次预混胰岛素治疗但血糖控制不佳的成年 2 型 DM 患者中,每日两次或三次给药的预混治疗(LM75/25)与 BBT(每日 4 次注射)相比非劣效。临床试验注册号:NCT00279201。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验