Al-Harasi Sharifa, Ashley Paul F, Moles David R, Parekh Susan, Walters Val
Military Dental Centre, PO Box 454, PC 121, Seeb, Oman.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4(8):CD007154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007154.pub2.
Managing children is a challenge that many dentists face. Many non-pharmacological techniques have been developed to manage anxiety and behavioural problems in children, such us: 'tell, show & do', positive reinforcement, modelling and hypnosis. The use of hypnosis is generally an overlooked area, hence the need for this review.
This systematic review attempted to answer the question: What is the effectiveness of hypnosis (with or without sedation) for behaviour management of children who are receiving dental care in order to allow successful completion of treatment?
Hypnosis has no effect on the outcome of dental treatment of children.
We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), and PsycINFO. Electronic and manual searches were performed using controlled vocabulary and free text terms with no language restrictions. Date of last search: 11th June 2010.
All children and adolescents aged up to 16 years of age. Children having any dental treatment, such as: simple restorative treatment with or without local anaesthetic, simple extractions or management of dental trauma.
Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures and results were independently extracted, in duplicate, by two review authors. Authors of trials were contacted for details of randomisation and withdrawals and a quality assessment was carried out. The methodological quality of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the criteria described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.0.2.
Only three RCTs (with 69 participants) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis and meta-analysis were not possible due to insufficient number of studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there are a considerable number of anecdotal accounts indicating the benefits of using hypnosis in paediatric dentistry, on the basis of the three studies meeting the inclusion criteria for this review there is not yet enough evidence to suggest its beneficial effects.
管理儿童患者是许多牙医面临的一项挑战。已经开发出许多非药物技术来管理儿童的焦虑和行为问题,例如:“告知、展示和操作”、正面强化、示范和催眠。催眠的应用通常是一个被忽视的领域,因此需要进行本次综述。
本系统综述试图回答以下问题:为使牙科治疗得以顺利完成,催眠(无论是否使用镇静剂)对接受牙科护理的儿童进行行为管理的效果如何?
催眠对儿童牙科治疗的结果没有影响。
我们检索了Cochrane口腔健康小组试验注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库(OVID)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(OVID)和心理学文摘数据库。使用受控词汇和自由文本词进行电子和手工检索,无语言限制。最后检索日期:2010年6月11日。
所有16岁及以下的儿童和青少年。正在接受任何牙科治疗的儿童,例如:使用或不使用局部麻醉的简单修复治疗、简单拔牙或牙外伤处理。
两名综述作者独立、重复地提取有关方法、参与者、干预措施、结局指标和结果的信息。联系试验作者获取随机分组和退出的详细信息,并进行质量评估。使用《Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》5.0.2中描述的标准评估随机对照试验(RCT)的方法学质量。
只有三项RCT(共69名参与者)符合纳入标准。由于研究数量不足,无法进行统计分析和荟萃分析。
尽管有大量轶事表明在儿童牙科中使用催眠有益,但基于符合本综述纳入标准的三项研究,尚无足够证据表明其具有有益效果。