FitzGerald Garret A
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mt Sinai J Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;77(4):327-32. doi: 10.1002/msj.20198.
New-drug approvals have remained roughly constant since 1950, while the cost of drug development has soared. It seems likely that a more modular approach to drug discovery and development will evolve, deriving some features from the not-for-profit sector. For this to occur, we must address the deficit in human capital with expertise in both translational medicine and therapeutics and also in regulatory science; utilize regulatory reform to incentivize innovation and the expansion of the precompetitive space; and develop an informatics infrastructure that permits the global, secure, and compliant sharing of heterogeneous data across academic and industry sectors. These developments, likely prompted by the perception of crisis rather than opportunity, will require linked initiatives among academia, the pharmaceutical industry, the US National Institutes of Health, and the US Food and Drug Administration, along with a more adventurous role for venture capital. A failure to respond threatens the United States' lead in biomedical science and in the development and regulation of novel therapeutics.
自1950年以来,新药获批数量大致保持稳定,而药物研发成本却大幅飙升。一种更具模块化的药物发现与研发方法似乎将会出现,它会借鉴非营利部门的一些特点。要实现这一点,我们必须解决在转化医学、治疗学以及监管科学方面具备专业知识的人力资本短缺问题;利用监管改革激励创新并扩大竞争前空间;并开发一种信息学基础设施,以实现跨学术和产业部门的全球、安全且合规的异构数据共享。这些发展很可能是由危机感而非机遇感所推动,将需要学术界、制药行业、美国国立卫生研究院以及美国食品药品监督管理局之间的联动举措,同时风险投资要发挥更具冒险性的作用。若不做出回应,将威胁到美国在生物医学科学以及新型治疗药物研发与监管方面的领先地位。