Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Phys Ther. 2010 Oct;90(10):1468-78. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090390. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
Investigating determinants of physical therapy workload in the acute care setting is essential for planning interventions, for justifying resource allocation, and for reimbursement.
The objective of this study was to examine whether International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) intervention goals (ICF categories representing goals of physical therapy interventions typical for an acute care hospital) could predict physical therapy workload in the acute care hospital setting.
This investigation was a multicenter, observational cohort study.
Patients were recruited from a representative sample of 32 acute care hospitals across Switzerland if they received physical therapy during their inpatient stay for the treatment of any injury or disease in 1 of 3 main diagnostic categories: musculoskeletal, neurological, and cardiopulmonary conditions. Physical therapists completed questionnaires at the time of the patients' discharge to report on ICF intervention goals. Information on workload was collected retrospectively from hospital documentation systems. Multivariable regression models were used to identify the intervention goals independently associated with workload.
The mean workload for 642 patients (mean age=61 years [SD=18 years], 45% women) was 370 minutes. The daily workload for interventions ranged from 33 minutes (cardiopulmonary conditions) to 49 minutes (neurological conditions). There were significant variations in workload across hospital sites and medical disciplines. The goal "maintaining a body position" emerged as a significant indicator of a higher workload for all condition groups; the goals "attention functions" and "transferring oneself" were indicators for neurological and musculoskeletal conditions, respectively.
Not all potential predictors of workload could be examined. Other, person- or setting-specific variables might have been relevant to workload. Case mix and clinical practice were representative only for Swiss hospitals.
A small set of intervention goals were the major factors influencing physical therapy workload, independent of diagnosis or clinical specialty. Describing variability in physical therapists' practices in the acute care setting and relating these data to relevant patient-centered outcomes are the initial steps for improving resource allocation and reimbursement for interventions that maintain or improve functioning.
研究急性护理环境中物理治疗工作量的决定因素对于规划干预措施、证明资源分配的合理性以及报销都是至关重要的。
本研究的目的是检验国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)干预目标(代表急性护理医院中物理治疗干预目标的 ICF 类别)是否可以预测急性护理医院环境中的物理治疗工作量。
这是一项多中心、观察性队列研究。
如果患者在瑞士 32 家急性护理医院中的任何一家因任何损伤或疾病住院治疗(3 个主要诊断类别之一:肌肉骨骼、神经和心肺疾病)期间接受物理治疗,将其招募到研究中。物理治疗师在患者出院时填写问卷,报告 ICF 干预目标。工作量信息从医院文档系统中回顾性收集。使用多变量回归模型确定与工作量独立相关的干预目标。
642 名患者(平均年龄=61 岁[标准差=18 岁],45%为女性)的平均工作量为 370 分钟。干预措施的日常工作量范围从 33 分钟(心肺疾病)到 49 分钟(神经疾病)。医院间和医疗科室间的工作量存在显著差异。“保持身体姿势”这一目标成为所有疾病组中较高工作量的显著指标;“注意力功能”和“自我转移”这两个目标分别是神经和肌肉骨骼疾病的指标。
并非所有潜在的工作量预测因素都可以进行检查。其他与个人或环境相关的变量可能与工作量有关。病例组合和临床实践仅代表瑞士的医院。
一小部分干预目标是影响物理治疗工作量的主要因素,与诊断或临床专业无关。描述急性护理环境中物理治疗师实践的变异性,并将这些数据与相关的以患者为中心的结果相关联,是改善维持或改善功能的干预措施的资源分配和报销的初始步骤。