Department of Toxicology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Toxicology. 2010 Oct 9;276(2):135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2010.07.020. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
Young adult male Wistar rats, a species commonly used in inhalation toxicity studies, and OF1 mice, a species often used in sensory irritation studies, were simultaneously nose-only exposed for 45-min to ammonia in concentrations from 92 to 1243 mg/m(3). This study examined airway reflexes by the changes in respiratory patterns elicited by ammonia in either dry, steam-humidified (approximately 95% relative humidity) or aqueous aerosol containing atmospheres. This served the objective to explore whether high concentrations of anhydrous ammonia and/or high humidity and aqueous aerosol change the predominant nasal deposition site to more distal locations in the lung. Animals from all groups tolerated the exposure without evidence of respiratory tract irritation, changes in body and lung weights. The evoked changes on breathing patterns resembled those known to occur following exposure to 'upper respiratory tract sensory irritants', rapid in onset and reversibility. Reflex stimulation from the lower airways was not observed in any group. While mice showed some adaption during the 45-min exposure period, rats displayed more stable changes in respiratory patterns. In this species humidity- or aqueous aerosol-related changes in sensory irritation potency did not occur to any appreciable extent. The respiratory decrease 50%, RD(50), was 972 and 905 mg/m(3) in dry and wet air, respectively. In contrast, mice appeared to more susceptible to ammonia in presence of dry air (the RD(50), was 582 and 732 mg/m(3) in dry and wet air, respectively). In summary, it was shown that the sensory irritation potency of ammonia does not increase when inhaling wet atmospheres nor penetrates this gas into the lower airways up to 1243 mg/m(3)×45-min. The mild-to-moderate sensory irritation-related effects observed at ≈ 400 mg/m(3) (571 ppm)×45-min do not appear to be offensive enough to impair escape as a result of upper airway sensations. Interestingly, this rat-based estimate matches almost exactly the experienced-based RAM TRAC recommendations of 696 and 492 ppm for 30 and 60 min, respectively.
成年雄性 Wistar 大鼠是吸入毒性研究中常用的物种,而 OF1 小鼠是常用于感觉刺激研究的物种,它们同时通过鼻吸入法暴露于 92 至 1243mg/m³的氨中,暴露时间为 45 分钟。本研究通过氨引起的呼吸模式变化来检查气道反射,这些变化是在干燥、蒸汽加湿(约 95%相对湿度)或含有气溶胶的水溶液中产生的。目的是探索无水氨的高浓度和/或高湿度和水溶液气溶胶是否会将主要的鼻沉积部位改变为肺部更远端的位置。所有组别的动物都耐受了暴露,没有呼吸道刺激、体重和肺部重量变化的迹象。呼吸模式的诱发变化类似于已知的暴露于“上呼吸道感觉刺激物”后发生的变化,即快速发作和可逆性。在任何一组中都没有观察到下呼吸道的反射刺激。虽然小鼠在 45 分钟暴露期间表现出一些适应,但大鼠的呼吸模式变化更为稳定。在这种物种中,湿度或水溶液气溶胶相关的感觉刺激效力变化没有明显程度的发生。呼吸下降 50%(RD50),在干燥和湿润空气中分别为 972 和 905mg/m³。相比之下,当处于干燥空气中时,小鼠似乎对氨更敏感(RD50,在干燥和湿润空气中分别为 582 和 732mg/m³)。总之,结果表明,当吸入湿润的大气时,氨的感觉刺激效力不会增加,并且在高达 1243mg/m³×45 分钟的时间内,氨也不会穿透这种气体进入下呼吸道。在 ≈ 400mg/m³(571ppm)×45 分钟时观察到的轻度至中度与感觉刺激相关的影响似乎不会强烈到足以因上呼吸道感觉而妨碍逃脱。有趣的是,这个基于大鼠的估计值与基于经验的 RAM TRAC 建议几乎完全吻合,即分别为 30 分钟和 60 分钟时的 696ppm 和 492ppm。