How successful is lung-preserving radical surgery in the mesothelioma and radical surgery-trial environment? A case-controlled analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is a survival benefit from open-lung-preserving surgery (radical decortication) for malignant mesothelioma, when compared with the non-radical approach in the mesothelioma and radical surgery (MARS)-trial era.

METHODS

We compared outcomes between 13 patients with malignant mesothelioma, who underwent radical decortication (group RD, n = 13) with 13 case-matched patients, who had palliative surgery (group non-radical decortication (NRD), n = 13) over a period of 2 years from June 2006 onwards. Patients were matched for age, sex, histology, computed tomography (CT) stage, haematological indices, body mass index (BMI) and adjuvant chemotherapy. We compared perioperative and postoperative courses and long-term survival.

RESULTS

Histology was 25% biphasic and 75% epithelioid in both the groups. There was no significant difference in the proportions receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (54%, p = 1.00), but more patients in the RD group received adjuvant radiotherapy (46% vs 15%, p = 0.20). Median survival was higher for all cell types in the RD group (16.9 months vs 6.8 months, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Radical open-lung-sparing surgery may confer a survival advantage to patients with malignant mesothelioma, who are fit to undergo radical decortication followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Trials of radical surgery versus no surgery should include lung-sparing operations.