Lauscher J C, Buhr H J, Gröne J, Ritz J P
Klinik für Allgemein-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, Berlin, Germany.
Chirurg. 2011 Mar;82(3):255-62. doi: 10.1007/s00104-010-1969-4.
Inguinal hernia (IH) surgery has changed fundamentally during the last 25 years due to tension-free repair, minimally-invasive approaches and growing influence of economy in medical decision making. Aim of the study was the documentation and analysis of changes in IH surgery during the last 15 years in our patient cohort.
Patients undergoing elective or emergency inguinal/femoral hernia repair from January 1995 to December 2009 were included in the study. Analysis of patient data was carried out by prospective online recording.
A total of 1,908 patients with 2,124 IHs were treated in the study period and the number of IH repairs decreased continuously. The number of recurrent hernias peaked in 2005-2009 with 16.4%. The average preoperative hospital stay decreased from 2.4 to 0.4 days and the postoperative hospital stay from 7.0 to 3.3 days. The percentage of suture repairs declined from 54.9% in 1995 to 4.1% in 2009 and the percentage of open tension-free repairs rose to 52.9% in 1998. In the following years the majority of repairs were performed by minimally invasive procedures but in 2009 the percentage of conventional hernia repairs exceeded the rate of minimally invasive repairs.
The main reason for these changes is the implementation of diagnosis-related groups which hampers inpatient repair of "simple" inguinal hernias, favors short hospital stay and does not adequately reimburse minimally invasive repairs.
在过去25年中,腹股沟疝(IH)手术因无张力修补、微创方法以及经济因素在医疗决策中日益增长的影响而发生了根本性变化。本研究的目的是记录和分析过去15年中我们患者队列中IH手术的变化情况。
纳入1995年1月至2009年12月期间接受择期或急诊腹股沟/股疝修补术的患者。通过前瞻性在线记录对患者数据进行分析。
在研究期间共治疗了1908例患者的2124例腹股沟疝,腹股沟疝修补术的数量持续下降。复发性疝的数量在2005 - 2009年达到峰值,为16.4%。术前平均住院天数从2.4天降至0.4天,术后住院天数从7.0天降至3.3天。缝合修补的比例从1995年的54.9%降至2009年的4.1%,开放式无张力修补的比例在1998年升至52.9%。在随后的几年中,大多数修补手术采用微创方法,但在2009年,传统疝修补术的比例超过了微创修补术的比例。
这些变化的主要原因是实施了诊断相关分组,这阻碍了“简单”腹股沟疝的住院修补,有利于缩短住院时间,并且对微创修补术的报销不足。