Suppr超能文献

肠促胰岛素作用维持胰岛素分泌,但不能改善空腹血糖受损人群的肝胰岛素作用。

Incretin action maintains insulin secretion, but not hepatic insulin action, in people with impaired fasting glucose.

机构信息

University of Colorado at Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Oct;90(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Aug 13.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine whether altered GLP-1 activity contributes to the abnormal endogenous glucose production (EGP) and insulin secretion characteristic of people with impaired fasting glucose (IFG).

METHODS

People with IFG (n=10) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT; n=13) underwent assessment of EGP (via [6,6-(2)H(2)]-glucose infusion). Parameters of whole body insulin action and secretion were estimated by IVGTT and OGTT. Measures of EGP and insulin secretion were made before and after sitagliptin administration.

RESULTS

EGP was not different at baseline (glucose R(a); 1.47+/-0.08 vs. 1.46+/-0.05mg/kg/min, IFG vs. NGT, p=0.93). However, when differences in circulating insulin were accounted for (EGPXSSPI; 20.2+/-2.1 vs. 14.4+/-1.0AU, vs. NGT, p=0.03) the hepatic insulin resistance index was significantly higher in IFG. Baseline insulin action (S(i); 2.3+/-0.1x10(-4)/microU/ml vs. 3.5+/-0.4x10(-4)/microU/ml, p=0.01, IFG vs. NGT) and secretion (DI; 587+/-81x10(-4)/min vs. 1171+/-226x10(-4)/min, p=0.04, IFG vs. NGT) were impaired in IFG when evaluated by the IVGTT, but not by OGTT (insulin sensitivity 4.52+/-1.08x10(-4)dl/kg/min vs. 6.73+/-1.16x10(-4)dl/kg/min, IFG vs. NGT, p=0.16; indices of basal (Phi(b)), static (Phi(s)), dynamic (Phi(d)), and total (Phi(t)) insulin secretion, p>0.07). Sitagliptin did not change EGP or insulin secretion in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Incretin action maintained insulin secretion, but not hepatic insulin action, in people with IFG.

摘要

目的

确定 GLP-1 活性的改变是否导致空腹血糖受损(IFG)人群中异常的内源性葡萄糖产生(EGP)和胰岛素分泌。

方法

IFG 组(n=10)和正常糖耐量组(NGT;n=13)接受[6,6-(2)H(2)]-葡萄糖输注评估 EGP。通过 IVGTT 和 OGTT 估计全身胰岛素作用和分泌的参数。在西格列汀给药前后测量 EGP 和胰岛素分泌。

结果

基础时 EGP 无差异(葡萄糖 R(a);1.47+/-0.08 与 1.46+/-0.05mg/kg/min,IFG 与 NGT,p=0.93)。然而,当考虑循环胰岛素差异时(EGPXSSPI;20.2+/-2.1 与 14.4+/-1.0AU,与 NGT 相比,p=0.03),IFG 的肝胰岛素抵抗指数显著更高。IFG 的基础胰岛素作用(S(i);2.3+/-0.1x10(-4)/microU/ml 与 3.5+/-0.4x10(-4)/microU/ml,p=0.01,IFG 与 NGT)和分泌(DI;587+/-81x10(-4)/min 与 1171+/-226x10(-4)/min,p=0.04,IFG 与 NGT)通过 IVGTT 评估时受损,但通过 OGTT 则不受影响(胰岛素敏感性 4.52+/-1.08x10(-4)dl/kg/min 与 6.73+/-1.16x10(-4)dl/kg/min,IFG 与 NGT,p=0.16;基础(Phi(b))、静态(Phi(s))、动态(Phi(d))和总(Phi(t))胰岛素分泌指数,p>0.07)。西格列汀在两组中均未改变 EGP 或胰岛素分泌。

结论

在 IFG 人群中,肠降血糖素作用维持了胰岛素分泌,但没有维持肝胰岛素作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验