Kurihara Yosuke, Watanabe Kajiro, Tanaka Hiroshi
Department of Computer and Information Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Seikei University, Tokyo 180-8633, Japan.
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010 Nov;14(6):1428-35. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2010.2067221. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
The judgment standards of R-K method include ambiguities and are thus compensated by subjective interpretations of sleep-stage scorers. This paper presents a novel method to compensate uncertainties in judgments by the subjective interpretations by the sleep-model estimation approach and by describing the judgments in probabilistic terms. Kalman filter based on the two sleep models with no body movement and with body movement was designed. Sleep stages judged by three different scorers were rejudged by the filter. The two sleep models were stochastically estimated from biosignals from 15 nights' data and the rejudged scores by the filter were evaluated by the data from 5 nights. The average values of kappa statistics, which show the degree of agreement, were 0.85, 0.89, and 0.81, respectively, for the original sleep stages. Because the new method provides probabilities on how surely the sleep belongs to each sleep stage, we were able to determine the most, second most, and third most probable sleep stage. The kappa statistics between the most probable sleep stages were improved to 0.90, 0.93, and 0.84, respectively. Those of sleep stages determined from the most and second most probable were 0.92, 0.94, and 0.89 and those from the most, second most, and third most probable were 0.95, 0.97, and 0.92. The sleep stages estimated by the filter are expressed by probabilistic manner, which are more reasonable in expression than those given by deterministic manner. The expression could compensate the uncertainties in each judgments and thus were more accurate than the direct judgments.
R-K方法的判断标准存在模糊性,因此需要睡眠阶段评分者的主观解释来进行补充。本文提出了一种新方法,通过睡眠模型估计方法的主观解释以及用概率术语描述判断来补偿判断中的不确定性。设计了基于无身体运动和有身体运动这两种睡眠模型的卡尔曼滤波器。由三位不同评分者判断的睡眠阶段由该滤波器重新判断。从15个夜晚的数据中的生物信号随机估计这两种睡眠模型,并通过5个夜晚的数据评估滤波器重新判断的分数。对于原始睡眠阶段,显示一致性程度的kappa统计量的平均值分别为0.85、0.89和0.81。由于新方法提供了睡眠属于每个睡眠阶段的确定程度的概率,我们能够确定最可能、第二可能和第三可能的睡眠阶段。最可能的睡眠阶段之间的kappa统计量分别提高到0.90、0.93和0.84。由最可能和第二可能的睡眠阶段确定的kappa统计量为0.92、0.94和0.89,由最可能、第二可能和第三可能的睡眠阶段确定的kappa统计量为0.95、0.9