Suppr超能文献

药理学应激剂的进展:聚焦于雷加曲班。

Advances in pharmacologic stress agents: focus on regadenoson.

作者信息

Johnson Sara G, Peters Scott

机构信息

Nuclear Medicine Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California 92161, USA.

出版信息

J Nucl Med Technol. 2010 Sep;38(3):163-71. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.109.065581. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

Abstract

Myocardial perfusion imaging using radionuclides is a well-established protocol for determining the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of coronary artery disease. Pharmacologic stress agents are used to induce cardiac hyperemia in patients unable to achieve the target workload by physical exercise alone. The vasodilators adenosine and dipyridamole are most commonly used, with dobutamine used only when these agents are contraindicated. However, because of frequent and intense side effects, as well as complex procedures both for patients and the nuclear medicine staff, there is room for improvement in these traditional stress agents. An ideal stress agent would be effective, safe, and well tolerated; have a simple protocol; be suitable for use in patients with reactive airway disease; and have few restrictions for the patient to adhere to before the procedure. Neither adenosine nor dipyridamole are receptor-specific, and act on A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) adenosine receptors. As it is the A(2A) receptor that mediates the desired coronary vasodilation, the A(1), A(2B), and A(3) adenosine receptors are deemed responsible for most side effects associated with adenosine and dipyridamole. A(2A)-selective pharmacologic stress agents should mediate the required hyperemic response while reducing the frequency of adverse events. The only selective A(2A) adenosine receptor agonist currently approved for clinical use as a pharmacologic stress agent for myocardial perfusion imaging is regadenoson. Regadenoson has demonstrated non-inferiority to adenosine for detecting reversible myocardial perfusion defects in phase 3 trials, and patients were more comfortable during the regadenoson stress procedure than during an adenosine infusion. As regadenoson dosing is not dependent on patient weight or renal impairment and can be administered by rapid injection, it has the potential to simplify the stress procedure, reduce costs, and streamline the working day for the staff of the nuclear medicine department. In this review, the need to improve on older pharmacologic stress agents will be considered, along with an assessment of how A(2A) receptor agonists fulfill that potential. Practical aspects of regadenoson are reviewed, and the impact that A(2A) receptor agonist use may have on the nuclear medicine department is evaluated.

摘要

使用放射性核素进行心肌灌注成像是确定冠状动脉疾病的诊断、预后和治疗方案的成熟方法。对于仅通过体育锻炼无法达到目标工作量的患者,使用药物应激剂诱导心脏充血。最常用的血管扩张剂是腺苷和双嘧达莫,只有在这些药物禁忌时才使用多巴酚丁胺。然而,由于频繁且严重的副作用,以及对患者和核医学工作人员来说操作都很复杂,这些传统应激剂仍有改进空间。理想的应激剂应有效、安全且耐受性良好;操作流程简单;适用于患有反应性气道疾病的患者;并且患者在检查前需要遵守的限制较少。腺苷和双嘧达莫都不是受体特异性的,它们作用于A(1)、A(2A)、A(2B)和A(3)腺苷受体。由于介导所需冠状动脉扩张的是A(2A)受体,因此A(1)、A(2B)和A(3)腺苷受体被认为是与腺苷和双嘧达莫相关的大多数副作用的原因。A(2A)选择性药物应激剂应能介导所需的充血反应,同时减少不良事件的发生频率。目前唯一被批准用于临床作为心肌灌注成像药物应激剂的选择性A(2A)腺苷受体激动剂是瑞加腺苷。在3期试验中,瑞加腺苷在检测可逆性心肌灌注缺损方面已证明不劣于腺苷,并且在瑞加腺苷应激过程中患者比腺苷输注时更舒适。由于瑞加腺苷的给药不依赖于患者体重或肾功能损害,并且可以通过快速注射给药,它有可能简化应激过程、降低成本并简化核医学科工作人员的工作日。在这篇综述中,将考虑改进旧的药物应激剂的必要性,以及对A(2A)受体激动剂如何实现这一潜力的评估。还将回顾瑞加腺苷的实际应用方面,并评估使用A(2A)受体激动剂可能对核医学科产生的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验