Schultz Celia E
Yale University.
J Am Acad Relig. 2010;78(2):516-41. doi: 10.1093/jaarel/lfq002.
The Roman abhorrence of human sacrifice presented by ancient literary sources stands in contrast to the frequency of rites requiring the death of a human being performed by the Romans during the Republic (509-44 BCE). After examining the ways our sources talk about ritual murder, especially as it was practiced by foreign peoples and subversive or tyrannical elements within Roman society, this discussion turns to the issue of the forms of ritual murder performed by the Romans. Of these various rites, the only one clearly identified by them as human sacrifice, that is, as an offering to the gods of a human life, is the live interment of Gauls and Greeks. Other forms of ritual murder-the burial of unchaste Vestal Virgins and the drowning of hermaphroditic children-were not, in Roman opinion, sacrifice. This distinction made the disposal of Vestal Virgins and hermaphrodites acceptable.
古代文献资料所呈现的罗马人对人祭的憎恶,与罗马共和国时期(公元前509年至公元前44年)罗马人频繁举行的、需要有人死亡的仪式形成了鲜明对比。在考察了我们的资料来源谈论仪式谋杀的方式之后,尤其是当这种行为由外国人和罗马社会内部的颠覆性或专制性因素实施时,本讨论转向了罗马人所实施的仪式谋杀形式的问题。在这些不同的仪式中,他们唯一明确认定为人祭的,也就是向神灵献上人命的,是对高卢人和希腊人的活埋。其他形式的仪式谋杀——埋葬不贞洁的维斯塔贞女和淹死两性人儿童——在罗马人看来并非献祭。这种区别使得对维斯塔贞女和两性人的处置变得可以接受。