Suppr超能文献

拇趾跖趾关节融合术后再融合是否必要?

Is it necessary to re-fuse a non-union of a Hallux metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis?

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Aug;31(8):662-9. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0662.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for a non-union of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint fusion has been to revise the fusion. Revision fusion is technically more demanding, often involving bone grafting, more substantial fixation and prolonged period of immobilization postoperatively. We present data to suggest that removal of hardware and debridement alone is an alternative treatment option.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A case note review identified patients with a symptomatic non-union after hallux metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) fusion. It is our practice to offer these patients revision fusion or removal of hardware and debridement. For the seven patients that chose hardware removal and were left with a pseudarthrosis, a matched control group was selected from patients who had had successful fusions. Three outcome scores were used. Hallux valgus and dorsiflexion angles were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine hallux MTPJ arthrodeses were carried out. Fourteen non-unions were identified. The rate of non-union in males and following previous hallux MTPJ surgery was 19% and 24%, respectively. In females undergoing a primary MTPJ fusion, the rate was 2.4%. Twelve non-union patients were reviewed at 27 months (mean). Eleven patients had elected to undergo removal of hardware and debridement. Four patients with pseudarthrosis were unhappy with the results and proceeded to either revision fusion or MTPJ replacement. Seven non-union patients, who had removal of hardware alone, had outcome scores marginally worse compared to those with successful fusions.

CONCLUSION

Removal of hardware alone is a reasonable option to offer as a relatively minor procedure following a failed arthrodesis of the first MTPJ. This must be accepted on the proviso that in this study four out of 11 (36%) patients proceeded to a revision first MTPJ fusion or first MTPJ replacement. We also found that the rate of non-union in primary first MTPJ fusion was significantly higher in males and those patients who had undergone previous surgery.

摘要

背景

大脚趾跖趾关节融合术后非愈合的标准治疗方法是对融合进行修正。修正融合在技术上要求更高,通常涉及植骨、更实质性的固定以及术后更长时间的固定。我们提供的数据表明,仅去除硬件和清创是另一种治疗选择。

材料和方法

病例记录回顾确定了大脚趾跖趾关节(MTPJ)融合后出现症状性非愈合的患者。我们的做法是为这些患者提供修正融合或去除硬件和清创。对于选择去除硬件并留下假关节的七名患者,从成功融合的患者中选择了匹配的对照组。使用了三个结果评分。记录了大脚趾外翻和背屈角度。

结果

进行了 139 例大脚趾 MTPJ 关节融合术。确定了 14 例非愈合。男性和先前大脚趾 MTPJ 手术后的非愈合率分别为 19%和 24%。在接受初次 MTPJ 融合的女性中,发生率为 2.4%。12 名非愈合患者在 27 个月(平均)时进行了随访。11 名患者选择了去除硬件和清创。4 名假关节患者对结果不满意,继而进行修正融合或 MTPJ 置换。仅去除硬件的 7 名非愈合患者的结果评分略低于成功融合的患者。

结论

在初次 MTPJ 融合失败后,作为相对较小的手术,单独去除硬件是一个合理的选择。必须接受这样一个前提,即在这项研究中,11 名患者中有 4 名(36%)患者进行了初次 MTPJ 融合或初次 MTPJ 置换的修正。我们还发现,初次 MTPJ 融合中男性和先前接受过手术的患者的非愈合率明显更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验