Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Aug;31(8):701-5. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0701.
A previous study suggests the double Krackow suture (locking-loop) weave technique is nearly twice as strong as the single Bunnell or single Kessler suture repair techniques. Our hypothesis was that the strength of different repair techniques would be comparable if a similar number of suture strands cross the repair site.
Twenty-four fresh-frozen human cadaver Achilles tendons were used to test maximum strength of three suture techniques (double Bunnell, double Kessler, and double Krackow). The simulated ruptures were created in the midsubstance of the Achilles tendon, five centimeters proximal to its calcaneal insertion. All repairs were performed with No. 2 polyester (Mersilene, Ethicon, Sommerville, NJ) nonabsorbable suture in standard fashion for each technique, with four strands crossing the repair site. The tendons were then anchored to a materials testing machine (Instron, Canton, MA) through a calcaneal pin distally and a modified soft tissue clamp proximally. Tendons were loaded with continuous tension at a head speed of 0.85 cm/s.
All repairs failed at the site of the suture knots, none pulling out through the substance of the tendon. A one-way analysis of variance was performed on the maximum force at failure of each repair technique. No statistically significant difference was noted between the double Krackow weave (199.9 +/- 20 N), the double Bunnell weave (196.2 +/- 45 N), and the double Kessler weave (166.9 +/- 51 N).
We found that in a laboratory model of cadaveric Achilles tendon repairs there was no significant difference in strength between the Krackow, Bunnell, and Kessler suture techniques, when each was performed with a double suture weave.
This is a cadaveric study that attempts to simulate the clinical parameters of Achilles tendon ruptures, repairs, and repair failures to examine the strength of different repair techniques.
先前的研究表明,双 Krackow 缝合(锁环)编织技术的强度几乎是单 Bunnell 或单 Kessler 缝合修复技术的两倍。我们的假设是,如果穿过修复部位的缝线数量相似,那么不同修复技术的强度将具有可比性。
使用 24 个新鲜冷冻的人尸体跟腱来测试三种缝合技术(双 Bunnell、双 Kessler 和双 Krackow)的最大强度。模拟的断裂发生在跟腱的中部,距跟骨插入处近端 5 厘米处。所有修复均采用 No.2 聚酯(Mersilene,Ethicon,Sommerville,NJ)不可吸收缝线,以标准方式进行每种技术的修复,有四根缝线穿过修复部位。然后,通过跟骨销将肌腱远端固定在材料试验机(Instron,Canton,MA)上,并通过改良的软组织夹近端固定。肌腱以 0.85cm/s 的头部速度连续加载张力。
所有修复均在缝线结处失效,没有一根缝线从肌腱内部拔出。对每种修复技术的失效时最大力进行了单因素方差分析。双 Krackow 编织(199.9±20N)、双 Bunnell 编织(196.2±45N)和双 Kessler 编织(166.9±51N)之间没有统计学上的显著差异。
我们发现,在尸体跟腱修复的实验室模型中,当每种技术都采用双缝线编织时,Krackow、Bunnell 和 Kessler 缝线技术的强度之间没有显著差异。
这是一项尸体研究,旨在模拟跟腱断裂、修复和修复失败的临床参数,以检查不同修复技术的强度。