Ghiringhelli S, Onofri M, Guidali P L, Cozzi G, Arancio F, Bertoni P D, Canziani R, Mortarino G
Service of Cardiology, Ospedale di Gallarate, Italy.
Acta Cardiol. 1990;45(6):511-20.
We mechanocardiographically evaluated 50 patients with acute myocardial infarction, invasively monitored by Swan-Ganz catheters, in order to assess if mechanocardiography could provide reliable hemodynamic informations. The last 25 subjects were also studied by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Our results confirm the high precision of apexcardiography in assessing mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (r = 0.91) while Doppler echocardiography proved itself better than mechanocardiography in assessing cardiac output (r = 0.82 vs r = 0.78). Moreover, Doppler echocardiography allowed a good estimation of mean pulmonary artery pressure (r = 0.81) which cannot be assessed by other noninvasive methods. However, we could not find any clinically useful relationship between Doppler mitralic flow characteristics and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Therefore noninvasive methods could represent a valid alternative to right heart catheterization provided that an integrated Doppler echocardiographic and mechanocardiographic approach is used.
我们对50例急性心肌梗死患者进行了机械心动图评估,这些患者均通过Swan-Ganz导管进行有创监测,目的是评估机械心动图能否提供可靠的血流动力学信息。最后25名受试者还接受了脉冲多普勒超声心动图检查。我们的结果证实了心尖心动图在评估平均肺毛细血管楔压方面具有高精度(r = 0.91),而在评估心输出量方面,多普勒超声心动图证明比机械心动图更好(r = 0.82对r = 0.78)。此外,多普勒超声心动图能够很好地估计平均肺动脉压(r = 0.81),而其他非侵入性方法无法评估该指标。然而,我们未发现多普勒二尖瓣血流特征与平均肺毛细血管楔压之间存在任何临床上有用的关系。因此,只要采用多普勒超声心动图和机械心动图相结合的方法,非侵入性方法可以成为右心导管检查的有效替代方法。