Suppr超能文献

北美晚期肾细胞癌索拉非尼扩大准入计划中治疗的老年患者使用索拉非尼的安全性和疗效。

Safety and efficacy of sorafenib in elderly patients treated in the North American advanced renal cell carcinoma sorafenib expanded access program.

机构信息

Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 441214, USA.

出版信息

Oncology. 2010;78(5-6):340-7. doi: 10.1159/000320223. Epub 2010 Aug 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this retrospective analysis of the Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib (ARCCS) program in North America, we compared the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in patients aged ≥70 with those aged <70 years.

METHODS

Patients were treated with oral sorafenib twice daily until the occurrence of disease progression or treatment intolerance. The primary objective of the ARCCS program was making sorafenib available to patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA and Canada before marketing approval was obtained; the secondary objective was the evaluation of its safety and efficacy.

RESULTS

Of the 2,504 patients enrolled in the ARCCS program who received at least 1 dose of sorafenib, 736 (29%) were aged ≥70 years. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events included rash/desquamation (5% in both groups), hand-foot skin reaction (8% in those aged ≥70 years vs. 10% in those <70 years of age), hypertension (5 vs. 4%) and fatigue (7 vs. 4%). Partial response was seen in 4% of the patients in both age groups. The median overall survival for the ≥70-year versus <70-year groups was also similar (46 vs. 50 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no substantial differences in safety and efficacy between patients aged ≥70 and <70 years with advanced RCC treated with sorafenib.

摘要

目的

在这项回顾性分析北美晚期肾细胞癌索拉非尼(ARCCS)研究计划中,我们比较了年龄≥70 岁与<70 岁的晚期肾细胞癌患者使用索拉非尼的安全性和疗效。

方法

患者接受每日两次口服索拉非尼治疗,直至疾病进展或不耐受治疗。ARCCS 研究计划的主要目的是在获得市场营销批准之前在美国和加拿大为晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者提供索拉非尼;次要目的是评估其安全性和疗效。

结果

在接受至少一剂索拉非尼的 2504 例 ARCCS 计划入组患者中,736 例(29%)年龄≥70 岁。最常见的≥3 级不良事件包括皮疹/脱屑(两组均为 5%)、手足皮肤反应(70 岁及以上组为 8%,<70 岁组为 10%)、高血压(5%比 4%)和疲劳(7%比 4%)。两组患者的部分缓解率相似(均为 4%)。70 岁及以上组与<70 岁组的中位总生存期也相似(46 周比 50 周)。

结论

在接受索拉非尼治疗的晚期 RCC 患者中,年龄≥70 岁与<70 岁之间的安全性和疗效无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验