Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 1;36(10):794-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e531a1.
Retrospective clinical analyses of patients with cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA).
To report the clinical outcomes and predictive factors relating to the prognosis in conservative and surgical treatments for CSA.
CSA is a clinical entity characterized by muscle atrophy in the upper extremity without marked sensory disturbance or spastic tetraparesis. The indications for, and outcomes of conservative and surgical treatments for CSA have not been clearly enunciated.
Ninety patients with CSA were enrolled in this study. All of them initially received continuous cervical traction for 2 to 3 weeks as inpatients. If this conservative treatment was ineffective, surgical intervention was carried out after informed consent was obtained. We investigated the outcome of conservative treatment, the predictive factors relating to the prognosis of the conservative treatment, and the outcome of surgery after initial conservative treatment failed.
After initial conservative treatment, 42 patients (46.7%) showed excellent or good outcome, 29 patients underwent surgery, and 19 patients declined surgery. Consequently, 61 patients were conservatively followed up. At final follow-up, 40% of the patients still showed excellent or good neurologic status by conservative treatment, and this group was characterized by age <50 years, duration of symptoms <6 months, single-level stenosis, foraminal stenosis, and a good response to traction therapy. Additional 5 patients underwent surgery during follow-up because of deterioration of symptom, and 34 patients consequently underwent surgery at the final follow-up. Of 34, 28 (82%) patients who underwent surgery obtained neurologic improvement.
The present study has demonstrated the outcome of conservative and of surgical treatments for CSA, together with the predictive factors relating to the prognosis. Conservative treatment should be initially tried on CSA patients, especially those with predictive factors relating to a better prognosis. However, if conservative treatment failed, surgical intervention was successful.
回顾性分析颈椎脊髓病性肌萎缩(CSA)患者的临床资料。
报告与 CSA 保守和手术治疗预后相关的临床结果和预测因素。
CSA 是一种临床实体,其特征是上肢肌肉萎缩,无明显感觉障碍或痉挛性四肢瘫痪。CSA 的保守和手术治疗适应证及疗效尚未明确。
本研究共纳入 90 例 CSA 患者。所有患者均先接受 2 至 3 周的持续颈椎牵引作为住院治疗。如果保守治疗无效,在获得知情同意后进行手术干预。我们调查了保守治疗的结果、与保守治疗预后相关的预测因素,以及初始保守治疗失败后的手术结果。
初始保守治疗后,42 例(46.7%)患者疗效良好或优,29 例患者接受手术治疗,19 例患者拒绝手术。因此,61 例患者接受了保守治疗。最终随访时,40%的患者通过保守治疗仍表现出良好或优秀的神经功能状态,且这些患者的特点为年龄<50 岁、症状持续时间<6 个月、单节段狭窄、椎间孔狭窄,以及对牵引治疗反应良好。随访期间有 5 例患者因症状恶化而再次接受手术,最终有 34 例患者接受了手术治疗。在这 34 例患者中,有 28 例(82%)患者术后神经功能得到改善。
本研究表明了 CSA 保守和手术治疗的结果以及与预后相关的预测因素。应首先尝试对 CSA 患者进行保守治疗,特别是那些具有较好预后预测因素的患者。但是,如果保守治疗失败,手术干预是有效的。