School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
J Exp Bot. 2011 Jan;62(1):195-203. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq260. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
The stomata of conifers display very little short-term response to changes in atmospheric CO(2) concentration (C(a)), whereas the stomatal responses of angiosperms to C(a) increase in response to water stress. This behaviour of angiosperm stomata appears to be dependent on foliar levels of abscisic acid (ABA(f)). Here two alternative explanations for the stomatal insensitivity of conifers to C(a) are tested: that conifers have either low ABA(f) or a higher or absent threshold for ABA-induced sensitivity. The responsiveness of stomatal conductance (g(s)) to a sequence of transitions in C(a) (386, 100, and 600 μmol mol(-1)) was recorded over a range of ABA(f) in an angiosperm and two divergent conifer species. The different ABA levels were induced by a mild drought cycle. Although the angiosperm and conifer species showed similar proportional increases in ABA(f) following drought, conifer stomata remained insensitive to changes in C(a) whereas angiosperm stomata showed enhanced sensitivity with increasing ABA(f). The conifers, however, had much higher ABA(f) prior to drought than the angiosperm species, suggesting that non-sensitivity to C(a) in these conifers was due to an absent or inactive response/signalling pathway rather than insufficient ABA(f).
针叶树的气孔对大气 CO(2)浓度 (C(a)) 的短期变化几乎没有反应,而被子植物的气孔对 C(a) 的反应则会随着水分胁迫的增加而增加。被子植物气孔的这种行为似乎依赖于叶片中脱落酸 (ABA(f)) 的水平。本文测试了针叶树对 C(a)不敏感的两种替代解释:针叶树要么 ABA(f)水平低,要么 ABA 诱导敏感性的阈值较高或不存在。在一系列 C(a)(386、100 和 600 μmol mol(-1)) 转变过程中,记录了气孔导度 (g(s)) 对 ABA(f) 在一个被子植物和两个不同的针叶树种中的响应。不同的 ABA 水平是通过轻度干旱循环诱导的。尽管在干旱后,被子植物和针叶树种的 ABA(f) 都表现出相似的比例增加,但针叶树的气孔仍然对 C(a)的变化不敏感,而被子植物的气孔则随着 ABA(f)的增加而表现出更高的敏感性。然而,与被子植物物种相比,这些针叶树在干旱前的 ABA(f) 水平要高得多,这表明这些针叶树对 C(a)的不敏感性是由于不存在或无效的反应/信号通路,而不是 ABA(f) 不足。