Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Heart. 2010 Sep;96(17):1379-84. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.192419.
To prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation, pulmonary venous isolation (PVI) at an antral level is more effective than segmental ostial ablation. Cryoablation around the pulmonary venous (PV) ostia for AF therapy is potentially safer compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a strategy using a large cryoablation balloon to perform antral cryoablation with 'touch-up' ostial cryoablation for PVI in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF.
Paroxysmal and persistent AF patients undergoing their first left atrial ablation were recruited. After cryoballoon therapy, each PV was assessed for isolation and if necessary, treated with focal ostial cryoablation until PVI was achieved. Follow-up with Holter monitoring was performed. Clinical outcomes of the cryoablation protocol were compared, with consecutive patients undergoing PVI by RFA.
124 consecutive patients underwent cryoablation. 77% of paroxysmal and 48% of persistent AF subjects were free from AF at 12 months after a single procedure. Over the same time period, 53 consecutive paroxysmal AF subjects underwent PVI with RFA and at 12 months, 72% were free from AF at 12 months (p=NS). There were too few persistent AF subjects (n=8) undergoing solely PVI by RFA as a comparison group. Procedural and fluoroscopic times during cryoablation were significantly shorter than RFA.
PV isolation can be achieved in less than 2 h by a simple cryoablation protocol with excellent results after a single intervention, particularly for paroxysmal AF.
为了预防导管消融后的心房颤动(AF)复发,在窦房水平进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)比节段性口部消融更有效。与射频消融(RFA)相比,冷冻消融围绕肺静脉(PV)口部治疗 AF 可能更安全。本研究旨在探讨一种策略的疗效,该策略使用大的冷冻消融球囊在阵发性和持续性 AF 患者中进行窦房水平的冷冻消融,并进行“补点”口部冷冻消融以实现 PVI。
招募接受首次左心房消融的阵发性和持续性 AF 患者。冷冻球囊治疗后,评估每个 PV 的隔离情况,如果需要,用局灶性口部冷冻消融进行治疗,直到实现 PVI。进行 Holter 监测随访。比较冷冻消融方案的临床结果,并与连续接受 RFA 进行 PVI 的患者进行比较。
124 例连续患者接受了冷冻消融。单次手术后,77%的阵发性和 48%的持续性 AF 患者在 12 个月时无 AF。在相同的时间段内,53 例阵发性 AF 患者接受了 RFA 进行 PVI,在 12 个月时,72%的患者在 12 个月时无 AF(p=NS)。作为对照组,仅接受 RFA 进行持续性 AF 的患者数量较少(n=8)。冷冻消融过程中的手术和透视时间明显短于 RFA。
通过一种简单的冷冻消融方案,在不到 2 小时内即可实现 PV 隔离,单次干预后效果极佳,特别是对阵发性 AF。