Staff Jeremy, Schulenberg John E, Bachman Jerald G
The Pennsylvania State University.
Sociol Educ. 2010 Jul 1;83(3):183-200. doi: 10.1177/0038040710374585.
Teenagers working over 20 hours per week perform worse in school than youth who work less. There are two competing explanations for this association: (1) that paid work takes time and effort away from activities that promote achievement, such as completing homework, preparing for examinations, getting help from parents and teachers, and participating in extracurricular activities; and (2) that the relationship between paid work and school performance is spurious, reflecting preexisting differences between students in academic ability, motivation, and school commitment. Using longitudinal data from the ongoing national Monitoring the Future project, this research examines the impact of teenage employment on school performance and academic engagement during the 8th, 10th, and 12th grades. We address issues of spuriousness by using a two-level hierarchical model to estimate the relationships of within-individual changes in paid work to changes in school performance and other school-related measures. Unlike prior research, we also compare youth school performance and academic orientation when they are actually working in high-intensity jobs to when they are jobless and wish to work intensively. Results indicate that the mere wish for intensive work corresponds with academic difficulties in a manner similar to actual intensive work.
每周工作超过20小时的青少年在学业上的表现比工作时间较少的青少年更差。对于这种关联有两种相互竞争的解释:(1)有偿工作会占用时间和精力,使青少年无暇参与促进学业成就的活动,如完成家庭作业、备考、向家长和老师寻求帮助以及参加课外活动;(2)有偿工作与学业成绩之间的关系是虚假的,反映了学生在学术能力、动机和对学校的投入方面已有的差异。本研究利用正在进行的全国性“未来监测”项目的纵向数据,考察青少年就业对八年级、十年级和十二年级学生学业成绩和学业参与度的影响。我们通过使用两级分层模型来估计有偿工作的个体内部变化与学业成绩变化及其他与学校相关指标之间的关系,从而解决虚假性问题。与先前的研究不同,我们还比较了青少年在实际从事高强度工作时与失业且希望从事高强度工作时的学业成绩和学业取向。结果表明,仅仅是希望从事高强度工作就会与学业困难相关,这与实际从事高强度工作的情况类似。