Moralidis Efstratios, Spyridonidis Tryfon, Arsos Georgios, Skeberis Vassilios, Anagnostopoulos Constantinos, Gavrielidis Stavros
Department of Nuclear Medicine, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School,1 Stilponos Kyriakidi Str, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hell J Nucl Med. 2010 May-Aug;13(2):118-26.
This study aimed to determine systolic dysfunction and estimate resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from information collected during routine evaluation of patients with suspected or known coronary heart disease. This approach was then compared to gated single photon emission tomography (SPET). Patients having undergone stress (201)Tl myocardial perfusion imaging followed by equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA) were separated into derivation (n=954) and validation (n=309) groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to develop scoring systems, containing clinical, electrocardiographic (ECG) and scintigraphic data, for the discrimination of an ERNA-LVEF<0.50. Linear regression analysis provided equations predicting ERNA-LVEF from those scores. In 373 patients LVEF was also assessed with (201)Tl gated SPET. Our results showed that an ECG-Scintigraphic scoring system was the best simple predictor of an ERNA-LVEF<0.50 in comparison to other models including ECG, clinical and scintigraphic variables in both the derivation and validation subpopulations. A simple linear equation was derived also for the assessment of resting LVEF from the ECG-Scintigraphic model. Equilibrium radionuclide angiography-LVEF had a good correlation with the ECG-Scintigraphic model LVEF (r=0.716, P=0.000), (201)Tl gated SPET LVEF (r=0.711, P=0.000) and the average LVEF from those assessments (r=0.796, P=0.000). The Bland-Altman statistic (mean+/-2SD) provided values of 0.001+/-0.176, 0.071+/-0.196 and 0.040+/-0.152, respectively. The average LVEF was a better discriminator of systolic dysfunction than gated SPET-LVEF in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and identified more patients (89%) with a </=10% difference from ERNA-LVEF than gated SPET (65%, P=0.000). In conclusion, resting left ventricular systolic dysfunction can be determined effectively from simple resting ECG and stress myocardial perfusion imaging variables. This model provides reliable LVEF estimations, comparable to those from (201)Tl gated SPET, and can enhance the clinical performance of the latter.
本研究旨在通过对疑似或已知冠心病患者进行常规评估时收集的信息来确定收缩功能障碍,并估算静息左心室射血分数(LVEF)。然后将这种方法与门控单光子发射断层扫描(SPET)进行比较。接受过负荷(201)铊心肌灌注显像并随后进行平衡放射性核素血管造影(ERNA)的患者被分为推导组(n = 954)和验证组(n = 309)。采用逻辑回归分析来建立包含临床、心电图(ECG)和闪烁显像数据的评分系统,以鉴别ERNA-LVEF<0.50的情况。线性回归分析提供了根据这些评分预测ERNA-LVEF的方程。在373例患者中,还采用(201)铊门控SPET评估了LVEF。我们的结果表明,与其他包括ECG、临床和闪烁显像变量的模型相比,在推导和验证亚组中,ECG-闪烁显像评分系统是预测ERNA-LVEF<0.50的最佳简单预测指标。还从ECG-闪烁显像模型推导出了一个用于评估静息LVEF的简单线性方程。平衡放射性核素血管造影-LVEF与ECG-闪烁显像模型LVEF(r = 0.716,P = 0.000)、(201)铊门控SPET LVEF(r = 0.711,P = 0.000)以及这些评估的平均LVEF(r = 0.796,P = 0.000)具有良好的相关性。Bland-Altman统计量(均值±2标准差)分别给出的值为0.001±0.176、0.071±0.196和0.040±0.152。在受试者工作特征(ROC)分析中,平均LVEF比门控SPET-LVEF对收缩功能障碍的鉴别能力更强,并且与ERNA-LVEF差异≤10%的患者比门控SPET更多(89%对65%,P = 0.000)。总之,可通过简单的静息ECG和负荷心肌灌注显像变量有效地确定静息左心室收缩功能障碍。该模型提供了与(201)铊门控SPET相当的可靠LVEF估计值,并可提高后者的临床性能。