Mora Erika, Franco G
Cattedra e Scuola di Specializzazione di Medicina del lavoro, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia.
Med Lav. 2010 May-Jun;101(3):163-8.
The recently introduced Italian law on the protection of workers' health states that the occupational health physician (competent physician) is required to act according to the Code of Ethics of the International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH).
This paper aims at examining the articles of legislative decree 81/2008 dealing with informed consent and confidentiality compared with the corresponding points of the ICOH Ethics Code.
Analysis of the relationship between articles 25 and 39 (informed consent) and 18, 20 and 39 (confidentiality) of the decree shows that there are some points of disagreement between the legal requirements and the Code of Ethics, in particular concerning prescribed health surveillance, consent based on appropriate information (points 8, 10 and 12 of the Code) and some aspects of confidentiality (points 10, 20, 21, 22 and 23 of the Code).
Although the competent physician is required to act according to the law, the decisional process could lead to a violation of workers' autonomy.
最近出台的意大利工人健康保护法规定,职业健康医生(主管医生)必须按照国际职业健康委员会(ICOH)的道德准则行事。
本文旨在将2008年第81号立法令中关于知情同意和保密的条款与ICOH道德准则的相应要点进行对比研究。
对该法令第25条和第39条(知情同意)以及第18条、第20条和第39条(保密)之间的关系进行分析后发现,法律要求与道德准则之间存在一些分歧点,特别是在规定的健康监测、基于适当信息的同意(道德准则第8、10和12点)以及保密的某些方面(道德准则第10、20、21、22和23点)。
尽管要求主管医生依法行事,但决策过程可能会导致侵犯工人的自主权。