Hare Kristine Juul
Department of Biomedical Sciences, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4181.
This project consisted of two parts: a biochemical part and clinical studies. The overall aim was to elucidate the defective regulation of glucagon secretion in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The aim in the biochemical part was to develop a glucagon ELISA by using C- and N-terminal antibodies generated in the laboratory. Much effort was put into this attempt; however, we were unsuccessful and had to use an alternative method in our attempt to characterize the paradoxical diabetic glucagon response further. By using Sep-Pac and HPLC separation methods, plasma from patients with T2DM known to have a defective suppression of glucagon was analyzed using three antibodies and RIA. In this way the hyperglucagonaemia was found to consist mainly of authentic glucagon, rather than abnormally processed forms. The first clinical study included ten healthy controls matched to ten patients with T2DM. The aim was to investigate if GLP-1 induced glucagon inhibition was dose dependent and if suppression was equally potent in healthy controls and T2DM patients. Further, we investigated if the potency of the inhibition depended on the prevailing plasma glucose (PG) level. All participants were investigated with increasing doses of GLP-1 administered as iv-infusions and saline (control) during a glycaemic clamp at fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels. Patients were investigated on a third occasion with GLP-1 infusions after an over-night normalisation of PG using adjustable insulin infusions. From these experiments we were able to conclude that GLP-1-induced glucagon inhibition is dose-dependent, but surprisingly GLP-1 suppressed the alpha cell equally potently in patients and controls - and the suppression was independent of PG level. Therefore we concluded that the paradoxical glucagon response to orally ingested glucose is not caused by decreased potency of GLP-1 with respect to glucagon suppression. It may be due to the decreased secretion of this hormone reported in earlier studies. My second protocol aimed towards quantifying the glucose-lowering effect of GLP-1-induced glucagon inhibition seen in patients with T2DM. The glucose-lowering effect of GLP-1 is due to both insulin stimulation leading to peripheral glucose disposal and glucagon inhibition resulting in decreased stimulation of hepatic glucose production. With a five-day protocol including both glycaemic and pancreatic clamps in ten patients with T2DM we were able to isolate the contribution of glucagon suppression to the increased glucose turn-over seen during a GLP-1-glycaemic clamp, and interestingly it was equal to the known insulinotropic effect of GLP-1. Finally, we investigated patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and no residual beta cell function with oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and isoglycaemic intravenous glucose infusion (IIGI) in order to evaluate any differences in glucagon response to glucose +/- gastri-intestinal (GI)-stimulation. Here we found that despite a perfectly normal inhibition of glucagon during the IIGI in the T1DM, they had a defective glucagon suppression in response to orally ingested glucose and a paradoxical secretion of glucagon was seen as in T2DM. Hereby, we proved that glucagon suppression in response to hyperglycaemia does not entirely depend on intra-islet insulin effects as has been suggested. Therefore we conclude that GI-tract factors rather than intraislet dysregulation explain the paradoxical glucagon response in patients with diabetes.
生化部分和临床研究。总体目标是阐明2型糖尿病(T2DM)中胰高血糖素分泌的调节缺陷。生化部分的目标是利用实验室产生的C端和N端抗体开发一种胰高血糖素酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)。为此付出了很多努力;然而,我们没有成功,不得不采用另一种方法来进一步表征矛盾的糖尿病胰高血糖素反应。通过使用Sep-Pac和高效液相色谱(HPLC)分离方法,使用三种抗体和放射免疫分析(RIA)对已知胰高血糖素抑制功能缺陷的T2DM患者的血浆进行分析。通过这种方式,发现高胰高血糖素血症主要由真正的胰高血糖素组成,而非异常加工形式。第一项临床研究包括10名健康对照者和10名T2DM患者。目的是研究胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)诱导的胰高血糖素抑制是否呈剂量依赖性,以及在健康对照者和T2DM患者中抑制作用是否同样有效。此外,我们研究了抑制作用的效力是否取决于当时的血浆葡萄糖(PG)水平。在空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)水平的血糖钳夹期间,对所有参与者静脉输注递增剂量的GLP-1和生理盐水(对照)进行研究。在使用可调胰岛素输注使PG过夜正常化后,第三次对患者进行GLP-1输注研究。从这些实验中我们能够得出结论,GLP-1诱导的胰高血糖素抑制是剂量依赖性的,但令人惊讶的是,GLP-1在患者和对照者中对α细胞的抑制作用同样有效,且这种抑制作用与PG水平无关。因此我们得出结论,口服葡萄糖时矛盾的胰高血糖素反应并非由GLP-1对胰高血糖素抑制作用的效力降低所致。这可能是由于早期研究中报道的该激素分泌减少。我的第二个方案旨在量化T2DM患者中GLP-1诱导的胰高血糖素抑制所产生的降糖作用。GLP-1的降糖作用既归因于胰岛素刺激导致外周葡萄糖处置,也归因于胰高血糖素抑制导致肝葡萄糖生成刺激减少。通过一项为期五天的方案,对10名T2DM患者进行血糖钳夹和胰腺钳夹,我们能够分离出胰高血糖素抑制对GLP-1血糖钳夹期间增加的葡萄糖周转率的贡献,有趣的是,这与GLP-1已知的促胰岛素作用相当。最后,我们对1型糖尿病(T1DM)且无残余β细胞功能的患者进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)和等血糖静脉葡萄糖输注(IIGI),以评估胰高血糖素对葡萄糖±胃肠道(GI)刺激反应的任何差异。在此我们发现,尽管T1DM患者在IIGI期间胰高血糖素抑制完全正常,但他们对口服葡萄糖的胰高血糖素抑制存在缺陷,且出现了与T2DM患者一样的矛盾性胰高血糖素分泌。由此,我们证明了对高血糖的胰高血糖素抑制并不完全如所提示的那样依赖于胰岛内胰岛素作用。因此我们得出结论,胃肠道因素而非胰岛内调节异常解释了糖尿病患者中矛盾的胰高血糖素反应。