Suppr超能文献

CO 重呼吸期间动脉血、静脉血和毛细血管血的一氧化碳摄取动力学。

Carbon monoxide uptake kinetics of arterial, venous and capillary blood during CO rebreathing.

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Australian Institute of Sport, PO Box 176, Belconnen, ACT 2616, Australia.

出版信息

Exp Physiol. 2010 Dec;95(12):1156-66. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.054031. Epub 2010 Sep 3.

Abstract

The uptake and distribution of CO throughout the circulatory system during two different methods of CO rebreathing (2 min 'Schmidt' and 40 min 'Burge' methods) were determined in nine healthy volunteers. Specifically, the impact of (i) differences in circulatory mixing time (t(mix)), (ii) CO diffusion to myoglobin (Mb) and (iii) CO wash-out was assessed on calculated haemoglobin mass (Hb(mass)). Arterial (a), muscle venous (vm) and capillary samples (c) were obtained simultaneously at 0, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 20, 30 and 40 min for determination of carboxyhaemoglobin (HbCO). Carbon monoxide wash-out was measured from expired air following rebreathing. The rate of CO diffusion to Mb was calculated using the change in HbCO after t(mix), and the rate of CO wash-out. In both methods, HbCOa and HbCOc followed a near-identical time course, peaking within the first 2 min and decreasing thereafter. The HbCOvm increased slowly and was significantly lower at 1, 2 and 3.5 min in both methods (P < 0.01). The HbCOa peaked significantly higher in the Schmidt method (P = 0.03). Circulatory mixing had occurred by 10 min in most but not all subjects. The rate of CO wash-out was 0.25 ± 0.13 ml min⁻¹ in the Schmidt and 0.25 ± 0.16 ml min⁻¹ in the Burge method. The rate of CO diffusion to Mb was 0.22 ± 0.11 and 0.16 ± 0.13 ml min⁻¹ (P = 0.63) in Schmidt and Burge methods, respectively. Inhalation of a CO bolus during the Schmidt method results in faster HbCOa uptake but does not greatly shorten t(mix) or influence rates of CO wash-out and flux to Mb. The calculated Hb(mass) depends substantially on the plateau level of HbCO; therefore, it is paramount to ensure HbCO is mixed completely prior to blood sampling, as well as accounting for potential within-subject alterations of CO exhalation and CO flux to Mb.

摘要

在两种不同的 CO 再呼吸方法(2 分钟的“Schmidt”方法和 40 分钟的“Burge”方法)中,9 名健康志愿者的整个循环系统中 CO 的摄取和分布情况。具体来说,评估了(i)循环混合时间(t(mix))差异、(ii)CO 向肌红蛋白(Mb)的扩散以及(iii)CO 洗脱对计算血红蛋白质量(Hb(mass))的影响。同时在 0、1、2、3.5、5、7.5、10、12.5、15、20、30 和 40 分钟时从动脉(a)、肌肉静脉(vm)和毛细血管(c)样本中获得样品,以确定碳氧血红蛋白(HbCO)。CO 洗脱通过再呼吸后呼出的空气进行测量。使用 t(mix)后 HbCO 的变化以及 CO 洗脱的速度来计算 CO 向 Mb 的扩散速率。在两种方法中,HbCOa 和 HbCOc 都遵循非常相似的时间过程,在最初的 2 分钟内达到峰值,然后下降。HbCOvm 缓慢增加,在两种方法中,1、2 和 3.5 分钟时明显较低(P < 0.01)。在 Schmidt 方法中,HbCOa 峰值明显较高(P = 0.03)。混合在大多数但不是所有受试者中在 10 分钟内完成。CO 洗脱的速度在 Schmidt 方法中为 0.25 ± 0.13 ml min⁻¹,在 Burge 方法中为 0.25 ± 0.16 ml min⁻¹。CO 向 Mb 的扩散速率在 Schmidt 和 Burge 方法中分别为 0.22 ± 0.11 和 0.16 ± 0.13 ml min⁻¹(P = 0.63)。在 Schmidt 方法中吸入 CO 脉冲会导致 HbCOa 更快吸收,但不会大大缩短 t(mix)或影响 CO 洗脱和通量到 Mb 的速率。计算的 Hb(mass)主要取决于 HbCO 的平台水平;因此,在采血前确保 HbCO 完全混合非常重要,同时还要考虑到 CO 呼出和 CO 通量到 Mb 的潜在个体内变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验