• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The politics of universal access: the Massachusetts Health Security Act of 1988.

作者信息

Goldberger S A

机构信息

Brandeis University.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990 Winter;15(4):857-85. doi: 10.1215/03616878-15-4-857.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-15-4-857
PMID:2081892
Abstract

This article analyzes the passage of an unprecedented state law, promising every resident access to affordable health insurance. The Massachusetts Health Security Act of 1988 was the product of a set of political and financial pressures that had been developing for nearly a decade. Hospital, insurance, and business interests were unable to reach a new accommodation on hospital payment. This logjam created the opportunity for a policy breakthrough, but did not inherently lend itself to progressive reform. It was consumer activism that forced the traditional powers in health policy to address the interests of the uninsured. By imposing a more public-interest agenda on the process, consumers were able to change the configuration of the stalemate, but could not resolve it. The particular terms of the stalemate, however, made possible a new, more aggressive role for state government in health policy. Unable to satisfy their competing interests within a policy framework that had universal access as a goal, traditionally powerful interest groups found themselves increasingly dependent on the state to broker a new agreement. While the many concessions made to these groups are likely to prove to be the bill's undoing, the unraveling of the agreement will not end the story. The same pressures which led to passage of the Massachusetts law and which are now causing other states to act will continue to exert their effect until a more durable solution is found.

摘要

相似文献

1
The politics of universal access: the Massachusetts Health Security Act of 1988.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990 Winter;15(4):857-85. doi: 10.1215/03616878-15-4-857.
2
Regulation and federalism: legal impediments to state health care reform.监管与联邦制:州医疗保健改革的法律障碍。
Am J Law Med. 1993;19(1-2):121-44.
3
The slippery slope of health care finance: business interests and hospital reimbursement in Massachusetts.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990 Winter;15(4):887-913. doi: 10.1215/03616878-15-4-887.
4
The third wave of Massachusetts health care access reform.马萨诸塞州医疗保健准入改革的第三次浪潮。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w420-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w420. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
5
Massachusetts reform plus President Bush's tax credits: a national model?马萨诸塞州的改革加上布什总统的税收抵免:一种全国模式?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w444-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w444. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
6
The universal health care law in action.
Health PAC Bull. 1990 Summer;20(2):16-9, 21.
7
Mass retreat: the demise of Massachusetts hospital rate regulation.
J Am Health Policy. 1992 Mar-Apr;2(5-S):40-4.
8
The Massachusetts health insurance law: providing health insurance to all.马萨诸塞州健康保险法:为所有人提供健康保险。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Nov;98(11):1867-73.
9
Beyond Incrementalism? SCHIP and the politics of health reform.超越渐进主义?儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)与医疗改革政治
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):w399-410. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w399. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
10
Break the gridlock in Washington.
Minn Med. 1996 Apr;79(4):34.

引用本文的文献

1
US health care. III: The reform problem.
BMJ. 1992 Oct 17;305(6859):941-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6859.941.