Suppr超能文献

受挥发性氯化碳污染的潮汐河口的特定地点概率生态风险评估。

Site-specific probabilistic ecological risk assessment of a volatile chlorinated hydrocarbon-contaminated tidal estuary.

机构信息

Environmental Geology Group, School of Geosciences, Madsen Building, Room 350 F09, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010 May;29(5):1172-81. doi: 10.1002/etc.130.

Abstract

Groundwater contaminated with volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons (VCHs) was identified as discharging to Penrhyn Estuary, an intertidal embayment of Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. A screening-level hazard assessment of surface water in Penrhyn Estuary identified an unacceptable hazard to marine organisms posed by VCHs. Given the limitations of hazard assessments, the present study conducted a higher-tier, quantitative probabilistic risk assessment using the joint probability curve (JPC) method that accounted for variability in exposure and toxicity profiles to quantify risk (delta). Risk was assessed for 24 scenarios, including four areas of the estuary based on three exposure scenarios (low tide, high tide, and both low and high tides) and two toxicity scenarios (chronic no-observed-effect concentrations [NOEC] and 50% effect concentrations [EC50]). Risk (delta) was greater at low tide than at high tide and varied throughout the tidal cycle. Spatial distributions of risk in the estuary were similar using both NOEC and EC50 data. The exposure scenario including data combined from both tides was considered the most accurate representation of the ecological risk in the estuary. When assessing risk using data across both tides, the greatest risk was identified in the Springvale tributary (delta=25%)-closest to the source area-followed by the inner estuary (delta=4%) and the Floodvale tributary (delta=2%), with the lowest risk in the outer estuary (delta=0.1%), farthest from the source area. Going from the screening level ecological risk assessment (ERA) to the probabilistic ERA changed the risk from unacceptable to acceptable in 50% of exposure scenarios in two of the four areas within the estuary. The probabilistic ERA provided a more realistic assessment of risk than the screening-level hazard assessment.

摘要

受挥发性氯化烃(VCHs)污染的地下水被确定为排入澳大利亚新南威尔士州植物湾的潮汐港湾彭林湾。彭林湾地表水的筛选水平危害评估确定 VCHs 对海洋生物构成不可接受的危害。鉴于危害评估的局限性,本研究使用联合概率曲线(JPC)方法进行了更高层次的定量概率风险评估,该方法考虑了暴露和毒性特征的可变性,以量化风险(δ)。评估了 24 种情景,包括根据三种暴露情景(低潮、高潮和低潮和高潮)和两种毒性情景(慢性无观察效应浓度[NOEC]和 50%效应浓度[EC50])划分的四个河口区域。在低潮时的风险大于在高潮时的风险,并且在整个潮汐周期内变化。使用 NOEC 和 EC50 数据,河口的风险空间分布相似。包括两个潮汐数据的暴露情景被认为是河口生态风险的最准确表示。在使用横跨两个潮汐的数据评估风险时,在靠近源区的斯普林瓦尔支流(δ=25%)中发现的风险最大,其次是内部河口(δ=4%)和洪水瓦尔支流(δ=2%),而最远离源区的外部河口(δ=0.1%)风险最低。从筛选水平生态风险评估(ERA)到概率 ERA 的转变,在河口四个区域中的两个区域的 50%暴露情景中,将风险从不可接受变为可接受。概率 ERA 比筛选水平危害评估提供了更现实的风险评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验