Ervin Ann-Margret, Wojciechowski Robert, Schein Oliver
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, W5010, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 21205.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8(9):CD006775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006775.pub2.
Dry eye syndrome is a disorder of the tear film and is associated with symptoms of ocular discomfort. Punctal occlusion is a mechanical treatment in which the tear drainage system is blocked in order to aid in the preservation of natural tears on the ocular surface.
The objective of this review was to assess the safety and efficacy of punctal plugs for the management of dry eye.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 6), MEDLINE (January 1950 to June 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to June 2010), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to June 2010), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com) and ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov). We also searched the Science Citation Index-Expanded database and reference lists of included studies. There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 21 June 2010.
We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of collagen or silicone punctal plugs in symptomatic participants diagnosed with aqueous tear deficiency or dry eye syndrome.
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study investigators for additional information.
Seven randomized controlled trials including 305 participants (601 eyes) met the inclusion criteria and are summarized in this review. We did not perform meta-analysis due to appreciable variability in interventions and follow-up intervals. Although punctal plugs provided symptomatic improvement and clinical outcomes also improved from baseline measures, few studies demonstrated a benefit of punctal plugs over the comparison intervention. Reported adverse effects included epiphora (overflow of tears), foreign body sensation, eye irritation, and spontaneous plug loss.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows a relative scarcity of controlled clinical trials assessing the efficacy of punctal occlusion therapy in dry eye. Although the evidence is very limited, the data suggest that silicone plugs can provide symptomatic relief in severe dry eye. Moreover, temporary collagen plugs appear similarly effective to silicone plugs on a short-term basis.
干眼综合征是一种泪膜紊乱疾病,伴有眼部不适症状。泪点封闭是一种机械治疗方法,即阻塞泪液引流系统,以帮助保持眼表的自然泪液。
本综述的目的是评估泪点塞治疗干眼的安全性和有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)(其中包含Cochrane眼科和视觉组试验注册库)(《Cochrane图书馆》2010年第6期)、MEDLINE(1950年1月至2010年6月)、EMBASE(1980年1月至2010年6月)、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区健康科学文献数据库(LILACS)(1982年1月至2010年6月)、对照试验元注册库(mRCT)(www.controlled-trials.com)和ClinicalTrials.gov(http://clinicaltrials.gov)。我们还检索了科学引文索引扩展数据库以及纳入研究的参考文献列表。检索试验时没有语言或日期限制。电子数据库的最后一次检索时间为2010年6月21日。
我们纳入了对诊断为水性泪液缺乏或干眼综合征的有症状参与者使用胶原或硅胶泪点塞的随机和半随机对照试验。
两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。我们联系了研究调查人员以获取更多信息。
七项随机对照试验,包括305名参与者(601只眼)符合纳入标准,在本综述中进行了总结。由于干预措施和随访间隔存在明显差异,我们未进行荟萃分析。尽管泪点塞能改善症状,临床结果也较基线测量有所改善,但很少有研究表明泪点塞比对照干预更具优势。报告的不良反应包括溢泪、异物感、眼部刺激和泪点塞自行脱落。
本系统综述表明,评估泪点封闭疗法治疗干眼疗效的对照临床试验相对较少。尽管证据非常有限,但数据表明硅胶泪点塞可缓解重度干眼的症状。此外,短期来看,临时胶原泪点塞似乎与硅胶泪点塞效果相似。