• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医护人员中使用一次性不锈钢与塑料喉镜叶片的比较。

Disposable stainless steel vs plastic laryngoscope blades among paramedics.

机构信息

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Brunswick, 08901, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;29(6):590-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.022. Epub 2010 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.022
PMID:20825833
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have been published in the literature about intubation methods, but little is available on intubation equipment used in this setting. This is the first prehospital comparison of disposable plastic vs disposable stainless steel laryngoscope blades used by paramedics.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare prehospital intubation success rates on first attempt and overall number of attempts to obtain intubations using disposable plastic laryngoscopes blades vs disposable stainless steel laryngoscope blades.

METHODS

A retrospective prehospital cohort study was conducted during two 3-year periods. Two-way contingency table and χ(2) test were conducted to determine if there was a difference between the 2 types of blades. A proportional odds model with calculated 95% confidence interval (CI) and odd ratios were then calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 2472 paramedic intubations were recorded over the 6-year period. The stainless steel single-use blades had a first attempt success rate of 88.9% vs 78.5% with plastic blades (P = .01; odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.17-3.41). The stainless steel single-use laryngoscope blade had a lower number of attempts to successful intubation than the plastic blade (88.8% vs 74.3%, respectively) (P < .01; odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.34-2.00).

CONCLUSIONS

In the prehospital setting, stainless steel disposable blades were superior to plastic disposable blades in first attempt and overall number of attempts to intubation. Until further research is done, we recommend use of stainless steel blades for intubations in the prehospital setting by paramedics.

摘要

背景

已有多篇关于插管方法的文献发表,但在该领域中,用于插管的设备相关内容却很少。这是首次对急救人员使用的一次性塑料和一次性不锈钢喉镜叶片进行的院前比较。

研究目的

本研究的目的是比较一次性塑料喉镜叶片与一次性不锈钢喉镜叶片在首次尝试和总体插管尝试次数方面的院前插管成功率。

方法

进行了一项回顾性的院前队列研究,研究期间为两个 3 年时间段。采用双向列联表和 χ(2)检验来确定这两种叶片之间是否存在差异。然后使用比例优势模型计算并得出 95%置信区间(CI)和优势比。

结果

在 6 年期间共记录了 2472 次由急救人员进行的插管。不锈钢一次性使用叶片的首次尝试成功率为 88.9%,而塑料叶片为 78.5%(P =.01;优势比,1.94;95%CI,1.17-3.41)。不锈钢一次性使用喉镜叶片成功插管的尝试次数少于塑料叶片(分别为 88.8%和 74.3%)(P <.01;优势比,1.64;95%CI,1.34-2.00)。

结论

在院前环境中,不锈钢一次性使用叶片在首次尝试和总体插管尝试次数方面均优于塑料一次性使用叶片。在进一步研究完成之前,我们建议急救人员在院前环境中使用不锈钢叶片进行插管。

相似文献

1
Disposable stainless steel vs plastic laryngoscope blades among paramedics.医护人员中使用一次性不锈钢与塑料喉镜叶片的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;29(6):590-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.022. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
2
A comparison of plastic single-use with metallic reusable laryngoscope blades for out-of-hospital tracheal intubation.用于院外气管插管的一次性塑料喉镜叶片与可重复使用金属喉镜叶片的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;50(3):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.04.022. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
3
Comparison of plastic and metallic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades: a randomised controlled trial.一次性塑料和金属喉镜叶片与可重复使用金属喉镜叶片的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Apr;30(4):163-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835c1cdb.
4
Comparison of single-use and reusable metal laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: a multicenter cluster randomized study.比较在快速序贯诱导麻醉期间经口气管插管使用一次性和可重复使用金属喉镜叶片:一项多中心整群随机研究。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Feb;112(2):325-32. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c92111.
5
Laryngoscope plastic blades in scheduled general anesthesia patients: a comparative randomized study.全麻患者使用喉镜塑料叶片:一项比较随机研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2011 Mar;23(2):107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.08.005.
6
Disposable laryngoscope blades do not interfere with ease of intubation in scheduled general anaesthesia patients.一次性喉镜叶片不影响择期全身麻醉患者的插管操作。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Sep;20(9):731-5. doi: 10.1017/s0265021503001182.
7
Effects of laryngoscope handle light source on the light intensity from disposable laryngoscope blades.喉镜手柄光源对一次性喉镜叶片光强度的影响。
Anaesthesia. 2014 Dec;69(12):1331-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.12790. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
8
Intubation of prehospital patients with curved laryngoscope blade is more successful than with straight blade.与直型喉镜叶片相比,使用弯型喉镜叶片对院前患者进行插管更成功。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;36(10):1807-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.100. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
9
Emerging evidence in infection control: effecting change regarding use of disposable laryngoscope blades.感染控制方面的新证据:一次性喉镜叶片使用的变革成效
AANA J. 2013 Apr;81(2):103-8.
10
[Single-use laryngoscope blade assessment].
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2004 Jul;23(7):694-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2004.03.017.