Laboratory for Infectious Diseases and Perinatal Screening, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Prenat Diagn. 2010 Nov;30(11):1039-43. doi: 10.1002/pd.2606.
In a previous discovery study, we identified seven potential screening markers for Down syndrome (DS). Here, we report on an extended study to validate the discriminative potential of these markers.
Concentrations of the seven analytes were measured using bead-based multiplexed immunoassays in maternal serum from 27 DS pregnancies and 27 matched controls. Control samples were matched to the cases by gestational age (exact day), maternal weight ( ± 5 kg), and maternal age ( ± 1 year) and by closest sample date. Prediction values were obtained for current screening markers [pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (fβ-hCG) and nuchal translucency (NT)] and seven markers identified before based on concentration fold ratios between DS and controls. Models were fitted based on data of the discovery study or this study and also tested on both datasets.
A significantly higher fold ratio was only found for epidermal growth factor (EGF) (-1.96; p = 0.006). In the prediction model for the current dataset, EGF improved the detection rate (DR) of DS by 5.7% [at a fixed 5% false-positive rate (FPR)] when added to the currently used screening markers.
Validation of previously identified biomarkers only confirmed EGF for further consideration as a DS screening marker. This underlines the importance of validating biomarkers; in this study, limiting the range of plausible biomarkers to only one suitable biomarker.
在之前的一项探索性研究中,我们确定了七个唐氏综合征(DS)潜在的筛查标志物。在此,我们报告了一项扩展研究,以验证这些标志物的区分潜力。
采用基于微珠的多重免疫分析法,测量 27 例 DS 妊娠和 27 例匹配对照的母体血清中七种分析物的浓度。对照样本按孕龄(精确日)、体重(±5kg)、年龄(±1 岁)和最近的样本日期与病例相匹配。根据当前的筛查标志物[妊娠相关血浆蛋白 A(PAPP-A)、游离β人绒毛膜促性腺激素(fβ-hCG)和颈项透明层(NT)]和之前根据 DS 与对照组浓度倍数比确定的七种标志物的预测值。基于发现研究或本研究的数据拟合模型,并在两个数据集上进行测试。
仅发现表皮生长因子(EGF)的倍数比显著更高(-1.96;p=0.006)。在当前数据集的预测模型中,当将 EGF 添加到当前使用的筛查标志物中时,DS 的检出率(DR)提高了 5.7%(在固定的 5%假阳性率(FPR)下)。
对先前确定的生物标志物的验证仅证实 EGF 可进一步考虑作为 DS 筛查标志物。这强调了验证生物标志物的重要性;在本研究中,将合理的生物标志物范围限制为仅一个合适的生物标志物。