Chopra Arvind
National Center for Biotechnology Information, NLM, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894
A common feature of most solid cancerous tumor types is the presence of hypoxic conditions (1) and the overexpression of carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX), a transmembrane cell-surface enzyme that is known to regulate the pH and adhesion of tumor cells (2). Hypoxic tumors are often resistant to radio- and chemotherapy, have a high metastatic potential, and usually predict a poor outcome for the cancer patient (3). Although several methods (invasive and noninvasive) are available for the detection of hypoxia in tumors, including the use of radiolabeled small molecules, these methods are not completely reliable because they either yield variable diagnoses or have functional limitations due to incomplete penetration of tumors and fail to detect hypoxia in all tumor types (3, 4). Because CA IX is overexpressed in most solid tumors, it is considered to be a hypoxia biomarker, and targeting the CA IX for the detection of hypoxic tumors is of great interest to investigators (1, 3-5). A I-labeled murine monoclonal antibody (mAb) that targets the CA IX, designated G250, was developed and evaluated for the radiotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients, but no major responses were observed because the individuals developed immunity to the mAb (6). Subsequently, a I-labeled chimeric form of G250, [I]-cG250, was developed and evaluated as an immunotherapeutic agent for the treatment of RCC (7). cG250 has been labeled with other nuclides (such as Zr, Lu, Y, etc.) and has been used in preclinical studies in rats (8) and for the treatment of RCC (7). However, only minor responses were observed in the clinical investigations, and dose escalation studies are ongoing (7). Radiolabeled antibodies (Abs) have a limited ability to detect or treat cancer because these agents show only a peripheral penetration of solid tumors (due to a large size, 150 kDa) and leave many neoplastic cells in the lesion untreated (9). In addition, Abs have prolonged blood circulation and present a high radiation dose risk to the bone marrow (10). In comparison, the smaller monovalent Fab (50 kDa) and the divalent F(ab’) (~100 kDa) fragments derived from the parent Ab exhibit better tumor penetration and a shorter circulating half-life and are likely to yield better results if used to detect or treat solid malignant tumors (9). Between the two fragment types, the divalent F(ab’) fragments may be more useful for the detection or treatment of malignant tumors because they have a higher affinity for the antigen (11). With these observations in mind, a divalent F(ab’) fragment of cG250 was developed, labeled with I, and compared with the intact [I]-cG250 Ab for its pharmacokinetic behavior and its ability to target tumors in mice and RCC patients (10). However, from this study the investigators concluded that the intact Ab was superior to the divalent fragment for targeting the RCC tumors. A clinical trial to investigate the safety of a I-labeled version of cG250 in patients with renal masses has been reported (12). In addition, cG250 is also under evaluation in several other clinical trials. Recently, Zr-labeled F(ab’) fragments of cG250 were shown to be suitable for the visualization of hypoxic head and neck cancer xenograft tumors in mice (5). Brouwers et al. compared the use of [In]-isothiocynate-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-cG250 and [I]-cG250 for the detection of RCC metastases in five patients and concluded that the former tracer was superior to the latter for visualization of the tumors (13). In another study involving three patients, it was shown that neither I-labeled cG250 nor In-labeled cG250 were suitable for the radioimmunotherapy of biliary cancer (14). In a recent study using 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-,’,'',’’’-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) as a nuclide conjugating agent, In-labeled cG250 Ab ([In]-DOTA-cG250) and its Fab ([In]-DOTA-Fab-cG250) and F(ab’) ([In]-DOTA-F(ab’)-cG250) fragments were generated and compared for their biodistribution and detection of hypoxic HT-29 cell (of human colorectal adenocarcinoma origin) xenograft tumors in mice (1). This chapter details the studies performed with [In]-DOTA-Fab-cG250. Studies performed with [In]-DOTA-cG250 (15) and [In]-DOTA-F(ab’)-cG250 (16) are discussed in separate chapters of MICAD (www.micad.nih.gov).
大多数实体癌肿瘤类型的一个共同特征是存在缺氧情况(1)以及碳酸酐酶IX(CA IX)的过表达,碳酸酐酶IX是一种跨膜细胞表面酶,已知其可调节肿瘤细胞的pH值和黏附性(2)。缺氧肿瘤通常对放疗和化疗具有抗性,具有高转移潜力,并且通常预示癌症患者的预后不良(3)。尽管有几种方法(侵入性和非侵入性)可用于检测肿瘤中的缺氧情况,包括使用放射性标记的小分子,但这些方法并不完全可靠,因为它们要么产生可变的诊断结果,要么由于肿瘤穿透不完全而存在功能限制,并且无法检测所有肿瘤类型中的缺氧情况(3,4)。由于CA IX在大多数实体瘤中过表达,因此它被认为是一种缺氧生物标志物,针对CA IX检测缺氧肿瘤引起了研究人员的极大兴趣(1,3 - 5)。一种靶向CA IX的I标记鼠单克隆抗体(mAb),命名为G250,已被开发并用于转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的放射治疗评估,但未观察到主要反应,因为个体对该mAb产生了免疫(6)。随后,一种I标记的G250嵌合形式,[I]-cG250,被开发并评估为治疗RCC的免疫治疗剂(7)。cG250已用其他核素(如Zr、Lu、Y等)标记,并已用于大鼠的临床前研究(8)以及RCC的治疗(7)。然而,在临床研究中仅观察到轻微反应,剂量递增研究正在进行中(7)。放射性标记抗体(Abs)检测或治疗癌症的能力有限,因为这些制剂仅显示对实体瘤的外周渗透(由于尺寸较大,约150 kDa),并且病变中的许多肿瘤细胞未得到治疗(9)。此外,抗体具有较长的血液循环时间,并且对骨髓存在高辐射剂量风险(10)。相比之下,源自亲本抗体的较小单价Fab(约50 kDa)和二价F(ab’)(约100 kDa)片段表现出更好的肿瘤穿透性和更短的循环半衰期,如果用于检测或治疗实体恶性肿瘤可能会产生更好的结果(9)。在这两种片段类型中,二价F(ab’)片段可能对恶性肿瘤的检测或治疗更有用,因为它们对抗原有更高的亲和力(11)。考虑到这些观察结果,开发了cG250的二价F(ab’)片段,用I标记,并与完整的[I]-cG250抗体比较其药代动力学行为以及在小鼠和RCC患者中靶向肿瘤的能力(10)。然而,研究人员从这项研究得出结论,完整抗体在靶向RCC肿瘤方面优于二价片段。一项关于I标记的cG250在肾肿块患者中的安全性的临床试验已有报道(12)。此外,cG250也在其他几项临床试验中进行评估。最近,cG250的Zr标记F(ab’)片段被证明适用于小鼠中缺氧头颈癌异种移植肿瘤的可视化(5)。Brouwers等人比较了[In]-异硫氰酸 - 二乙三胺五乙酸 - cG250和[I]-cG250在五名患者中检测RCC转移灶的情况,并得出结论,前一种示踪剂在肿瘤可视化方面优于后一种(13)。在另一项涉及三名患者的研究中,结果表明I标记的cG250和In标记的cG250均不适用于胆管癌的放射免疫治疗(14)。在最近一项使用1,4,7,10 - 四氮杂环十二烷 - N,N’,N’’,N’’’ - 四乙酸(DOTA)作为核素偶联剂的研究中,生成了In标记的cG250抗体([In]-DOTA - cG250)及其Fab([In]-DOTA - Fab - cG250)和F(ab’)([In]-DOTA - F(ab’)-cG250)片段,并比较了它们在小鼠中对缺氧HT - 29细胞(源自人结肠腺癌)异种移植肿瘤中的生物分布和检测情况(1)。本章详细介绍了用[In]-DOTA - Fab - cG250进行的研究。用[In]-DOTA - cG250(15)和[In]-DOTA - F(ab’)-cG250(16)进行研究在《MICAD》(www.micad.nih.gov)的单独章节中进行了讨论。