Hirschfeld J
Vox Sang. 1978 Jul-Aug;35(1-2):91-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1978.tb02905.x.
Two Caucasian population materials totalling 530 individuals and 3,180 typing results are analyzed with regard to various combinations of the Ag(x, y, a1, d, c, g) factors. Superficially, both materials appear well aligned to each other and the contemporary (simple-complex) framework. However, when the same set of data are structuralized within a new (complex-simple) framework, the typing results for 12 of 362 or 3.3% of the Swiss and no less than 19 of 168 or 11.3% of the English samples are not compatible with the new framework specifying that the various anti-Ag reagents can be arranged in two 'inclusion groups'--the anti-Ag (y greater than d greater than c) and the anti-Ag (g greater than a1 greater than x) series.
对总计530名个体和3180个分型结果的两份高加索人群材料，就Ag(x, y, a1, d, c, g)因子的各种组合进行了分析。表面上，两份材料彼此以及与当代（简单-复杂）框架都契合良好。然而，当同一组数据在新的（复杂-简单）框架内进行结构化处理时，瑞士样本中362个里有12个（即3.3%）以及英国样本中168个里不少于19个（即11.3%）的分型结果与新框架不兼容，该新框架规定各种抗Ag试剂可分为两个“包含组”——抗Ag（y大于d大于c）和抗Ag（g大于a1大于x）系列。
