IBES, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Integrative Physiology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB242TZ, UK.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010 Oct 8;401(1):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.09.018. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
Components of the insulin receptor signaling pathway are probably some of the best studied ones. Even though methods for studying these components are well established, the in vivo effects of different fasting regimens, and the time course of insulin receptor phosphorylation and that of its downstream components in insulin-sensitive peripheral tissues have not been analyzed in detail.
When assessing insulin signaling, it may be beneficial to drive insulin levels as low as possible by performing an overnight fast before injecting a supra-physiological dose of insulin. Recent studies have shown however that 5 or 6 h fast in mice is sufficient to assess physiological responses to insulin and/or glucose in glucose tolerance tests, insulin tolerance tests and euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp studies. Moreover, mice are nocturnal feeders, with ∼70% of their daily caloric intake occurring during the dark cycle, and their metabolic rate is much higher than humans. Therefore, an overnight fast in mice is closer to starvation than just food withdrawal. Thus our aim was to assess insulin signaling components from the insulin receptor to downstream targets IRS1, Akt/PKB, GSK3, Erk1/2 and ribosomal protein S6 in muscle, liver and adipose tissue in 5 h versus 16 h (overnight) fasted mice, and the time course (0-30 min) of these phosphorylation events. We also assessed whether re-feeding under 5 h and 16 h fasting conditions was a more robust stimulus than insulin alone.
Our study determines that a short food withdrawal from mice, for a period of 5 h, results in a similar insulin-stimulated response in phosphorylation events as the long overnight fast, presenting a more physiological experimental set up. We also demonstrate that in vivo, insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of its signaling components is different between different peripheral tissues, and depending on the tissue(s) and protein(s) of interest, an appropriate time course should be chosen.
胰岛素受体信号通路的组成部分可能是研究得最好的部分之一。尽管研究这些成分的方法已经确立,但不同禁食方案的体内效应,以及胰岛素敏感外周组织中胰岛素受体磷酸化及其下游成分的时间过程尚未详细分析。
在评估胰岛素信号时,通过在注射超生理剂量胰岛素前进行 overnight fast(过夜禁食),可能会使胰岛素水平尽可能低,从而获得更好的效果。然而,最近的研究表明,在小鼠中禁食 5 或 6 小时足以评估葡萄糖耐量试验、胰岛素耐量试验和葡萄糖稳态高胰岛素钳夹试验中胰岛素和/或葡萄糖的生理反应。此外,小鼠是夜行性动物,其每日约 70%的热量摄入发生在黑暗周期内,其代谢率远高于人类。因此,小鼠的 overnight fast( overnight 禁食)比仅仅禁食更接近饥饿。因此,我们的目的是评估胰岛素受体下游靶标 IRS1、Akt/PKB、GSK3、Erk1/2 和核糖体蛋白 S6 等胰岛素信号成分在 5 小时和 16 小时( overnight 禁食)禁食小鼠的肌肉、肝脏和脂肪组织中的表达,以及这些磷酸化事件的时间过程(0-30 分钟)。我们还评估了在 5 小时和 16 小时禁食条件下重新喂食是否比单独胰岛素更能刺激这些信号通路。
我们的研究表明,在小鼠中进行为期 5 小时的短期禁食会导致与 overnight fast( overnight 禁食)相似的胰岛素刺激磷酸化反应,从而呈现出更接近生理的实验设置。我们还表明,在体内,胰岛素刺激其信号成分的磷酸化在不同的外周组织中是不同的,并且取决于感兴趣的组织和蛋白,应该选择适当的时间过程。