Suppr超能文献

通过分析两个压力波形计算前向和后向动脉波。

Calculation of forward and backward arterial waves by analysis of two pressure waveforms.

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Dec;57(12):2833-9. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2073467. Epub 2010 Sep 7.

Abstract

We developed a technique to calculate forward and backward arterial waves from proximal and distal pressure waveforms. First, the relationship between the waveforms is represented with an arterial tube model. Then, the model parameters are estimated via least-squares fitting. Finally, the forward and backward waves are calculated using the parameter estimates. Thus, unlike most techniques, the arterial waves are determined without a more difficult flow measurement or an experimental perturbation. We applied the technique to central aortic and femoral artery pressure waveforms from anesthetized dogs during drug infusions, volume changes, and cardiac pacing. The calculated waves predicted an abdominal aortic pressure waveform measurement more accurately (2.4 mmHg error) than the analyzed waveforms (5.3 mmHg average error); reliably predicted relative changes in a femoral artery flow measurement (14.7% error); and changed as expected with selective vasoactive drugs. The ratio of the backward- to forward-wave magnitudes was 0.37 ± 0.05 during baseline. This index increased by ∼50% with phenylephrine and norepinephrine, decreased by ∼60% with dobutamine and nitroglycerin, and changed little otherwise. The time delay between the waves in the central aorta was 175 ± 14 ms during baseline. This delay varied by ±∼25% and was inversely related to mean pressure.

摘要

我们开发了一种从近端和远端压力波形计算前向和后向动脉波的技术。首先,用动脉管模型表示波形之间的关系。然后,通过最小二乘法拟合估计模型参数。最后,使用参数估计值计算前向和后向波。因此,与大多数技术不同,动脉波的确定不需要更困难的流量测量或实验干扰。我们将该技术应用于麻醉犬的中心主动脉和股动脉压力波形,在药物输注、容量变化和心脏起搏期间。计算出的波比分析波形(平均误差为 5.3mmHg)更准确地预测腹主动脉压力波形测量值(误差为 2.4mmHg);可靠地预测股动脉流量测量的相对变化(误差为 14.7%);并随选择性血管活性药物的变化而变化。在基线时,后向波与前向波幅度的比值为 0.37 ± 0.05。用苯肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素时,该指数增加约 50%;用多巴酚丁胺和硝酸甘油时,该指数减少约 60%;其他情况下变化不大。在基线时,中心主动脉中的波之间的时间延迟为 175 ± 14ms。该延迟变化约为±25%,并与平均压力成反比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验