Suppr超能文献

遗传学与南部非洲史前史:考古学视角

Genetics and southern African prehistory: an archaeological view.

作者信息

Mitchell Peter

机构信息

School of Archaeology, University of Oxford.

出版信息

J Anthropol Sci. 2010;88:73-92.

Abstract

Southern African populations speaking languages that are often - but inaccurately - grouped together under the label 'Khoisan' are an important focus of molecular genetic research, not least in tracking the early stages of human genetic diversification. This paper reviews these studies from an archaeological standpoint, concentrating on modern human origins, the introduction of pastoralism to southern Africa and admixture between the region's indigenous foragers and incoming Bantu-speaking farmers. To minimise confusion and facilitate correlation with anthropological, linguistic and archaeological data it emphasises the need to use ethnolinguistic labels accurately and with due regard for the particular histories of individual groups. It also stresses the geographically and culturally biased nature of the genetic studies undertaken to date, which employ data from only a few 'Khoisan' groups. Specific topics for which the combined deployment of genetic and archaeological methods would be particularly useful include the early history of Ju-Hoan- and Tuu-speaking hunter-gatherers, the expansion of Khoe-speaking populations, the chronology of genetic exchange between hunter-gatherers and farmers, and the origins of the Sotho/Tswana- and Nguni-speaking populations that dominate much of southern Africa today.

摘要

讲着常被——但不准确地——归为“科伊桑语系”这一标签下语言的南部非洲人群,是分子遗传学研究的一个重要焦点,尤其是在追踪人类基因多样化的早期阶段方面。本文从考古学角度审视这些研究,重点关注现代人类起源、畜牧业传入南部非洲以及该地区本土觅食者与新来的讲班图语的农民之间的混合情况。为尽量减少混淆并便于与人类学、语言学和考古学数据相互参照,本文强调需要准确使用民族语言标签,并充分考虑各个群体的独特历史。本文还强调了迄今为止所进行的基因研究在地理和文化上存在的偏向性,这些研究仅采用了少数“科伊桑语系”群体的数据。基因和考古方法联合运用会特别有用的具体主题包括讲朱-霍安语和图语的狩猎采集者的早期历史、讲科伊语人群的扩张、狩猎采集者与农民之间基因交流的年代顺序,以及如今在南部非洲大部分地区占主导地位的讲索托语/茨瓦纳语和恩古尼语人群的起源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验