PDI Ninth House, 1040 Crown Point Parkway, Suite 560, Atlanta, GA 30328, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):807-23. doi: 10.1037/a0019464.
Although turnover is an issue of global concern, paradoxically there have been few studies of turnover across cultures. We investigated the cross-cultural generalizability of the job embeddedness model (Mitchell & Lee, 2001) by examining turnover in an individualistic country (United States) and a collectivistic country (India). Using cross-cultural data from call centers (N = 797), we demonstrated that although organization job embeddedness predicted turnover in both countries, different dimensions of job embeddedness predicted turnover in the United States and India. As hypothesized, on the basis of individualism-collectivism theory, person-job fit was a significant predictor of lower turnover in the United States, whereas person-organization fit, organization links, and community links were significant predictors of lower turnover in India. We also explored whether a newly developed construct of embeddedness-family embeddedness-predicts turnover above and beyond job embeddedness and found initial support for its utility in both the United States and India. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
尽管人员流动是一个全球性关注的问题,但具有讽刺意味的是,跨文化的人员流动研究却很少。我们通过考察个人主义国家(美国)和集体主义国家(印度)的人员流动,研究了工作嵌入模型(Mitchell & Lee,2001)的跨文化通用性。我们利用呼叫中心的跨国数据(N=797),证明了尽管组织工作嵌入度在两个国家都预示着人员流动,但工作嵌入度的不同维度在美国和印度预示着不同的人员流动。根据个人主义-集体主义理论,我们假设,人与工作的适配度是美国人员流动率降低的一个重要预测指标,而人与组织的适配度、组织联系和社区联系则是印度人员流动率降低的重要预测指标。我们还探讨了一个新开发的嵌入度概念,即家庭嵌入度,是否能在工作嵌入度之外预测人员流动,并初步支持其在美国和印度的实用性。本文讨论了理论和实践方面的意义。