Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
Metabolism. 2010 Oct;59 Suppl 1:S21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.07.011.
Therapeutic management of chronic pain has not been widely successful owing to a lack of understanding of factors that initiate and maintain the chronic pain condition. Efforts to delineate the mechanisms underlying pain long have focused on neuronal elements of pain pathways, and both opiate- and non-opiate-based therapeutics are thought largely to target neurons. Abnormal neuronal activity at the level of spinal cord "pain centers" in the dorsal horn leads to hypersensitivity or a hyperalgesic response subsequent to the initial painful stimulus. Only recently has the experimental literature implicated nonneuronal elements in pain because of the realization that glial-derived signaling molecules can contribute to and modulate pain signaling in the spinal cord. Most notably, glial proinflammatory mediators within the dorsal horn of the spinal cord appear to contribute to self-perpetuating pain. Chronic pain is modeled experimentally through a variety of manipulations of sensory nerves including cutting, crushing, resection, and ligation. The cellular and molecular responses in the spinal cord due to these manipulations often reveal activation of 2 types of glia: microglia and astrocytes. The activation states of both microglia and astrocytes are complex and may be driven by underlying chronic neuropathology and/or a chronically "primed" condition that accounts for their contribution to chronic pain. Recent evidence even suggests that opioid tolerance and withdrawal hyperalgesia may be initiated and maintained via actions of microglia and astroglia. Together, these recent findings suggest that glia will serve as novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of chronic pain. To fully exploit glia as novel therapeutic targets will require a greater understanding of glial biology, as well as the identification of agents able to control the glial reactions involved in chronic pain, without interfering with beneficial glial functions.
由于对引发和维持慢性疼痛状态的因素缺乏了解,慢性疼痛的治疗管理并未取得广泛成功。长期以来,人们一直致力于研究疼痛通路中神经元成分的机制,阿片类和非阿片类治疗药物在很大程度上被认为是针对神经元的。脊髓背角“疼痛中枢”水平的神经元异常活动导致初始疼痛刺激后产生超敏或痛觉过敏反应。由于认识到胶质衍生的信号分子可以在脊髓中参与和调节疼痛信号,最近实验文献才暗示了非神经元成分在疼痛中的作用。尤其是脊髓背角中的胶质促炎介质似乎有助于自我维持的疼痛。慢性疼痛通过对感觉神经的各种操作(包括切割、压碎、切除和结扎)在实验中建模。这些操作在脊髓中引起的细胞和分子反应通常会揭示 2 种胶质细胞的激活:小胶质细胞和星形胶质细胞。小胶质细胞和星形胶质细胞的激活状态都很复杂,可能是由潜在的慢性神经病理学和/或导致它们对慢性疼痛的贡献的慢性“预激活”状态驱动的。最近的证据甚至表明,阿片类药物耐受和戒断性痛觉过敏可能是通过小胶质细胞和星形胶质细胞的作用而引发和维持的。这些最近的发现表明,胶质细胞将作为治疗慢性疼痛的新的治疗靶点。要充分利用胶质细胞作为新的治疗靶点,需要更深入地了解胶质细胞生物学,以及确定能够控制涉及慢性疼痛的胶质反应的药物,而不会干扰有益的胶质功能。