Suppr超能文献

男性前列腺切除术后尿失禁吊带是否为有效选择?

Are male slings for post-prostatectomy incontinence a valid option?

机构信息

Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Opin Urol. 2010 Nov;20(6):465-70. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833ecd09.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stress incontinence in men is still a common problem after surgical treatment of prostatic disease. This article reviews the techniques and results of recently described surgical slings available to treat male stress incontinence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Medium-term follow-up (mean 3-4 years) of patients treated with bone-anchored slings has been recently published, suggesting a success rate (cured or improved) of 70-80%. Short-term follow-up (mean of 6-12 months) of transobturator retrourethral slings demonstrates a success rate of 62-83%. Novel sling designs include mechanisms to manipulate the tension postoperatively and inside-out transobturator trocar passage. Common complications associated with slings are acute urinary retention and perineal pain. Rare complications include urethral erosion and infection. Retropubic approaches are associated with a risk of bladder perforation.

SUMMARY

Male slings are a valid option for treating male stress incontinence, and do offer several advantages over the artificial urinary sphincter. However, long-term data and multicenter series are needed in order to compare directly with the artificial urinary sphincter.

摘要

目的综述

前列腺疾病手术后,男性压力性尿失禁仍然是一个常见问题。本文综述了最近描述的用于治疗男性压力性尿失禁的外科吊带技术和结果。

最新发现

最近发表了骨锚定吊带治疗患者的中期随访结果(平均 3-4 年),成功率(治愈或改善)为 70-80%。经闭孔尿道中段吊带的短期随访(平均 6-12 个月)显示成功率为 62-83%。新型吊带设计包括术后和经闭孔外穿刺器内部调节张力的机制。与吊带相关的常见并发症包括急性尿潴留和会阴部疼痛。罕见的并发症包括尿道侵蚀和感染。经耻骨后入路与膀胱穿孔的风险相关。

总结

男性吊带是治疗男性压力性尿失禁的有效选择,并且确实比人工尿道括约肌具有多项优势。然而,需要长期数据和多中心系列来直接与人工尿道括约肌进行比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验