Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Oct;44(10):1651-4. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P273. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
The revised labeling for long-acting β(2) agonists (LABAs) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is controversial and in part is inconsistent with the 2007 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program asthma guidelines. Two large randomized controlled studies, the Serevent Nationwide Surveillance (SNS) study and the Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial (SMART), and a 2008 meta-analysis conducted by the FDA were the main sources of information used to determine the label changes. A paucity of large, well-designed, controlled, prospective studies evaluating the asthma-related risks associated with LABAs makes it difficult to reach a consensus regarding how best to use LABAs in patients with asthma.
美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)对长效β(2)激动剂(LABA)的修订标签是有争议的,部分内容与 2007 年国家哮喘教育和预防计划(National Asthma Education and Prevention Program)哮喘指南不一致。两项大型随机对照研究,即 Serevent 全国监测(Serevent Nationwide Surveillance,SNS)研究和沙美特罗多中心哮喘研究试验(Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial,SMART),以及 2008 年 FDA 进行的荟萃分析,是确定标签变化的主要信息来源。缺乏大型、设计良好、对照、前瞻性研究来评估与 LABA 相关的哮喘风险,使得难以就如何最好地在哮喘患者中使用 LABA 达成共识。