Suppr超能文献

基层医疗哮喘患者的哮喘严重程度:四种不同严重程度分类方法的比较研究

Asthma severity in primary care asthma patients: a comparative study of four different approaches to severity classification.

作者信息

Arnlind Marianne Heibert, Nokela Mika, Ehrs Per-Olof, Wikström Jonsson Eva

机构信息

Centre for Allergy Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Prim Care Respir J. 2010 Dec;19(4):383-9. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2010.00046.

Abstract

AIMS

To explore the factor structure of asthma severity and asthma control and to compare the results of different approaches to asthma severity classification on the distribution of costs of asthma medication.

METHODS

Comparison of four different approaches to asthma severity classification and factor analysis of asthma control descriptors. A correlation analysis between costs and the different approaches to severity classification was performed.

RESULTS

The factor analysis suggests that asthma control consists of at least two factors. Four approaches to severity classification were explored and all except the 'GINA EXPANDED' classification tended to place patients in the most severe category. The pharmaceutical costs varied between 0 and 75 SEK per day (0 and 5.31 GBP; 0 and 7.68 EURO).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a considerable overlap between asthma control and asthma severity. None of the approaches used in this study present a superior satisfactory solution to the classification problem.

摘要

目的

探讨哮喘严重程度和哮喘控制的因素结构,并比较不同哮喘严重程度分类方法对哮喘药物治疗费用分布的影响。

方法

比较四种不同的哮喘严重程度分类方法,并对哮喘控制指标进行因素分析。对费用与不同严重程度分类方法之间进行相关性分析。

结果

因素分析表明,哮喘控制至少由两个因素组成。研究了四种严重程度分类方法,除“GINA扩展版”分类外,其他方法往往会将患者归为最严重的类别。药物费用每天在0至75瑞典克朗之间(0至5.31英镑;0至7.68欧元)。

结论

哮喘控制和哮喘严重程度之间存在相当大的重叠。本研究中使用的方法均未为分类问题提供一个优越的令人满意的解决方案。

相似文献

3
Control of asthma in real life: still a valuable goal?
Eur Respir Rev. 2015 Jun;24(136):361-9. doi: 10.1183/16000617.00001615.
4
Real-life retrospective observational study to determine the prevalence and economic burden of severe asthma in Spain.
J Med Econ. 2020 May;23(5):492-500. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1719118. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
5
Evolution of asthma severity in a cohort of young adults: is there any gender difference?
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 25;4(9):e7146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007146.
7
[Clinical significance and shortcoming of classification of asthma severity].
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2005 Mar;28(3):145-6.
8
Evaluating direct costs and productivity losses of patients with asthma receiving GINA 4/5 therapy in the United States.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Dec;123(6):564-572.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.08.462. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
9
Asthma in pregnancy: association between the Asthma Control Test and the Global Initiative for Asthma classification and comparisons with spirometry.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
Documenting asthma severity: do we get it right?
J Asthma. 2003 Sep;40(6):661-5. doi: 10.1081/jas-120019037.

引用本文的文献

1
Progression to Uncontrolled Severe Asthma: A Novel Risk Equation.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):44-50. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.1.44.
2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验