Shakhnovich Irina, Kiser Dennis, Satiani Bhagwan
Division of Vascular Diseases and Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Aug;44(6):483-8. doi: 10.1177/1538574410374128.
The accuracy of carotid duplex ultrasonography (CDU) in detecting moderate and severe carotid artery disease was evaluated in comparison with arteriography.
Accuracy of CDU was correlated with arteriographic findings using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria in 147 internal carotid arteries. The duplex measurements consisted of peak systolic velocities (PSVs), end diastolic velocities (EDVs), and internal carotid PSV to common carotid artery PSV ratios (ICA/CCA). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy (OA) using the 3 parameters were determined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed from the ultrasonographic data for detection of 50% or greater stenosis (moderate disease) and 70% or greater stenosis (severe disease).
CDU for detecting ≥ 50% stenosis had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 87.8%, and accuracy of 96.6%. The area under the ROC curves for PSV was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.93), for EDV was 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.92), and for ICA:CCA ratio was 0.95 (CI 0.91-0.99). CDU for detecting ≥ 70% stenosis had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 87.1%, and accuracy of 94.5%. The area under the ROC curves for PSV was 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.84), for EDV was 0.74 (95% CI of 0.65-0.82), and for ICA/CCA ratio was 0.89 (0.84-0.94).
We conclude that ≥ 50% stenosis and ≥ 70% stenosis can be reliably determined by CDU in our vascular laboratory. Each vascular laboratory must validate their own criteria against the current gold standard of carotid arteriography. A high degree of confidence in CDU is critical before any institution uses the test as the sole diagnostic method prior to carotid intervention.
通过与动脉造影术对比,评估颈动脉双功超声检查(CDU)检测中度和重度颈动脉疾病的准确性。
采用北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)标准,将147条颈内动脉的CDU检查结果与动脉造影结果进行相关性分析。双功超声测量包括收缩期峰值流速(PSV)、舒张末期流速(EDV)以及颈内动脉PSV与颈总动脉PSV之比(ICA/CCA)。确定使用这三个参数的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和总体准确性(OA)。根据超声检查数据构建受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,以检测50%或更高程度的狭窄(中度疾病)和70%或更高程度的狭窄(重度疾病)。
CDU检测≥50%狭窄的敏感性为100%,特异性为87.8%,准确性为96.6%。PSV的ROC曲线下面积为0.86(95%置信区间[CI]0.80 - 0.93),EDV为0.86(95%CI 0.80 - 0.92),ICA:CCA比值为0.95(CI 0.91 - 0.99)。CDU检测≥70%狭窄的敏感性为100%,特异性为87.1%,准确性为94.5%。PSV的ROC曲线下面积为0.76(95%CI 0.68 - 0.84),EDV为0.74(95%CI 0.65 - 0.82),ICA/CCA比值为0.89(0.84 - 0.94)。
我们得出结论,在我们的血管实验室中,CDU能够可靠地确定≥50%和≥70%的狭窄。每个血管实验室必须对照当前颈动脉造影的金标准验证自己的标准。在任何机构将该检查作为颈动脉干预前的唯一诊断方法之前,对CDU有高度信心至关重要。