Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Akademiska Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Oct;89(10):1298-303. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.501855.
To compare the skills in pelvic examination technique between students who have had training with professional patients and a control group of students trained using clinical patients.
Prospective controlled study.
University hospital.
Students attending three consecutive courses in obstetrics and gynecology at Karolinska University Hospital.
A study group of 53 students received training in pelvic examination with professional patients and was compared with a control group of 34 students who were trained using clinical patients.
The students' skills in pelvic examination technique were examined by teachers in a practical test. Students' skills were also evaluated by the students themselves and by the patients who participated in the examination.
Students who had training with professional patients were more skilled in performing a pelvic examination and better prepared to examine their own patients than students trained using clinical patients.
Training with professional patients is more effective in teaching pelvic examination technique than training with clinical patients. We recommend that the use of professional patients is considered in the training of medical students.
比较接受过专业患者培训的学生与接受临床患者培训的学生在骨盆检查技术方面的技能。
前瞻性对照研究。
大学医院。
卡罗林斯卡大学医院连续三届妇产科学生。
研究组 53 名学生接受专业患者的骨盆检查培训,并与 34 名接受临床患者培训的对照组学生进行比较。
教师在实践考试中检查学生的骨盆检查技术。学生自己和参与检查的患者也对学生的技能进行了评估。
接受专业患者培训的学生在进行骨盆检查方面的技能更熟练,并且比接受临床患者培训的学生更有准备去检查自己的患者。
与临床患者培训相比,专业患者培训在教授骨盆检查技术方面更有效。我们建议在医学生培训中考虑使用专业患者。