Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2010 Apr;73(4):334-7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.02.069.
The endoscopic transsphenoidal approach has become widely used for pituitary and extended skull base operations. Intraoperative conversion to a microscopic approach may be an important option in selected cases. We aim to characterize the operative situations in which such conversion occurred and facilitated the procedure.
From April 2008 through August 2009, 148 planned endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches were performed. All cases were retrospectively reviewed to identify those patients converted to a microscopic approach. Clinical and operative characteristics, reasons for conversion, and patient outcomes were reviewed.
Of the 148 endoscopic cases, conversion was undertaken in 27 (18%). Ten patients (37%) had undergone previous transsphenoidal surgery. Reasons for conversion in nonreoperation cases were atypical nasal anatomy (6 patients), acromegaly with distorted anatomy (5 patients), desire for binocular vision (3 patients), complex sphenoid sinus anatomy and difficulty visualizing sella/midline (2 patients), and obstructive mucosal bleeding (1 patient). Of the 10 reoperation procedures, conversions occurred in 3 patients with Cushing's disease and 2 with acromegaly. The primary reasons for conversion in reoperations were scarring with loss of anatomic landmarks (4 patients), mucosal bleeding (2 patients), acromegaly with distorted anatomy (2 patients), technical problem with visualization (1 patient), and desire for binocular surgery (1 patient).
Although endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery provides superior visualization in most patients, conversion to a microscopic or endoscopic-assisted approach may provide essential visualization in selected patients. This may be especially true in patients undergoing reoperation and patients with acromegaly or Cushing's disease. Trainees learning the endoscopic transsphenoidal approach should become familiar with the benefits and limitations of the various transsphenoidal approaches.
经鼻内镜颅底手术已广泛应用于垂体和颅底手术。在某些情况下,术中转换为显微镜手术可能是一个重要的选择。我们旨在描述发生这种转换的手术情况,并为其提供便利。
2008 年 4 月至 2009 年 8 月,共进行了 148 例计划经鼻内镜颅底手术。回顾性分析所有病例,以确定需要转换为显微镜手术的患者。分析了患者的临床和手术特点、转换原因和患者结局。
在 148 例经内镜手术中,有 27 例(18%)进行了转换。10 例患者(37%)曾接受过经鼻蝶窦手术。非重复手术患者转换的原因包括:非典型鼻腔解剖结构(6 例)、肢端肥大症伴解剖结构变形(5 例)、追求双眼视觉(3 例)、复杂蝶窦解剖结构和视丘下部/中线难以可视化(2 例)、以及黏膜阻塞性出血(1 例)。10 例重复手术中,3 例库欣病患者和 2 例肢端肥大症患者进行了转换。再次手术的主要原因包括:疤痕导致解剖标志丢失(4 例)、黏膜出血(2 例)、肢端肥大症伴解剖结构变形(2 例)、可视化技术问题(1 例)、以及追求双眼手术(1 例)。
尽管经鼻内镜颅底手术在大多数患者中提供了更好的可视化效果,但在某些患者中,转换为显微镜或内镜辅助手术可能会提供必要的可视化效果。对于再次手术的患者和库欣病或肢端肥大症患者尤其如此。学习经鼻内镜颅底手术的医生应该熟悉各种经鼻蝶窦入路的优缺点。