Department of Respiratory Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Dec;36(12):2066-73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2048-5. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
Leakage of oral secretions past endotracheal tubes (ETT) has been implicated in ventilator associated pneumonia. The aim of this bench study was to compare the ability of current generation ETT cuffs to prevent fluid leakage and to determine the specific mechanical ventilator settings that affect movement of fluid across an inflated ETT cuff.
Using a 2.3-cm internal diameter (ID) tracheal model and simulated ventilatory support, we evaluated the impact of cuff pressure (20 and 30 cmH(2)O), positive end-expiratory pressure/continuous positive airway pressure (PEEP/CPAP, 0-15 cmH(2)O), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP, 15-45 cmH(2)O), and mode of ventilation (volume control, volume assist/control, pressure control, pressure assist/control, and CPAP) on leakage of fluid past the ETT cuffs of 16 ETTs. The tracheal model was configured in the vertical position with 35 ml of vitaminwater(®) on top of the inflated ETT cuff and mechanically ventilated. Fluid leakage past the cuff was determined by calculating the volume change in the tracheal model after each 30-min ventilation period. Initially five 8.0-mm-ID ETTs of each manufacturer type were evaluated at baseline ventilator settings. Tubes allowing a consistent leak within two SD of the mean leakage for the five tubes were numbered in consecutive order. A single tube from this group was then randomly selected for detailed evaluation.
Cuff leakage varied among ETT types (p < 0.0001); median leak volume 6.0 ml (0.6-15.1) across all tubes under all conditions. Cuff leakage was inversely related to PEEP level, cuff pressure, and PIP except when PEEP was set at 15 cmH(2)O (all p < 0.0001). In addition, cuff leak varied among modes (p = 0.035).
Cuff leakage varies greatly among ETT types and is affected by cuff pressure, PEEP, PIP, and mode.
经气管插管(ETT)的口腔分泌物泄漏与呼吸机相关性肺炎有关。本实验的目的是比较新一代 ETT 套囊预防液体泄漏的能力,并确定影响充气 ETT 套囊内液体移动的特定机械通气设置。
使用内径(ID)为 2.3cm 的气管模型和模拟通气支持,我们评估了套囊压力(20 和 30cmH2O)、呼气末正压/持续气道正压通气(PEEP/CPAP,0-15cmH2O)、吸气峰压(PIP,15-45cmH2O)和通气模式(容量控制、容量辅助/控制、压力控制、压力辅助/控制和 CPAP)对 16 个 ETT 套囊泄漏液体的影响。气管模型处于垂直位置,充气 ETT 套囊上方有 35ml 的维生素水(®),并进行机械通气。通过计算每个 30 分钟通气周期后气管模型的体积变化来确定套囊周围的液体泄漏量。最初,在基线通气设置下评估了每种制造商类型的五个 8.0mm-ID ETT。允许五个管子的平均泄漏量的两个标准差内的一致泄漏的管子编号按顺序排列。然后从该组中随机选择一个单独的管子进行详细评估。
ETT 类型之间的套囊泄漏量不同(p<0.0001);在所有条件下,所有管子的中位泄漏量为 6.0ml(0.6-15.1)。套囊泄漏与 PEEP 水平、套囊压力和 PIP 呈负相关,但当 PEEP 设置为 15cmH2O 时除外(均 p<0.0001)。此外,套囊泄漏量在模式之间也有所不同(p=0.035)。
ETT 类型之间的套囊泄漏量差异很大,并且受套囊压力、PEEP、PIP 和模式的影响。