Meli Domenico Bertoloni
Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Ann Sci. 2010 Jul;67(3):405-29. doi: 10.1080/00033790.2010.488920.
The investigation and representation of insects in the seventeenth century posed huge problems: on the one hand, their size and texture required optical tools and fixation techniques to disentangle and identify their tiny parts; on the other, the esoteric nature of those parts required readers to make sense of images alien to their daily experiences. Naturalists and anatomists developed sophisticated techniques of investigation and representation, involving tacit and unusual conventions that even twentieth-century readers found at times baffling. This essay develops a comparative approach based on seven pairs of investigations involving Francesco Stelluti, Francesco Redi, Giovanni Battista Hodierna, Robert Hooke, Marcello Malpighi, and Jan Swammerdam. Seen together, they document an extraordinary time in the study of insects and reconstruct a number of iconographic dialogues shedding light on the conventions and styles adopted.
17世纪对昆虫的研究和呈现带来了巨大的问题:一方面,它们的大小和质地需要光学工具和固定技术来拆解和识别其微小部分;另一方面,这些部分的深奥性质要求读者理解与其日常经验迥异的图像。博物学家和解剖学家开发了复杂的研究和呈现技术,其中涉及一些默契且不寻常的惯例,即便20世纪的读者有时也觉得困惑。本文基于涉及弗朗切斯科·斯泰卢蒂、弗朗切斯科·雷迪、乔瓦尼·巴蒂斯塔·奥迪耶纳、罗伯特·胡克、马尔切洛·马尔皮基和扬·斯瓦默丹的七组研究,发展出一种比较方法。综合来看,它们记录了昆虫研究中的一段非凡时期,并重构了一些图像学对话,揭示了所采用的惯例和风格。