Suppr超能文献

有一个匿名戒酒会的赞助商是否有益?

Is it beneficial to have an alcoholics anonymous sponsor?

机构信息

Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Sep;24(3):397-403. doi: 10.1037/a0019013.

Abstract

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) attendance is predictive of increased abstinence for many problem drinkers and treatment referral to AA is common. Strong encouragement to acquire an AA sponsor is likewise typical, and findings about the benefits associated with social support for abstinence in AA support this practice, at least indirectly. Despite this widespread practice, however, prospective tests of the unique contribution of having an AA sponsor are lacking. This prospective study investigated the contribution of acquiring an AA sponsor using a methodologically rigorous design that isolated the specific effects of AA sponsorship. Participants were recruited from AA and outpatient treatment. Intake and follow-up assessments included questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and urine toxicology screens. Eligibility criteria limited prior treatment and AA histories to clarify the relationship of interest while, for generalizability purposes, broad substance abuse criteria were used. Of the 253 participants, 182 (72%) provided complete data on measures central to the aims of this study. Overall reductions in alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use were found over 12-months and lagged analyses indicated that AA attendance significantly predicted increased abstinence. During early AA affiliation but not later logistic regressions showed that having an AA sponsor predicted increased alcohol-abstinence and abstinence from marijuana and cocaine after first controlling for a host of AA-related, treatment, and motivational measures that are associated with AA exposure or are generally prognostic of outcome.

摘要

匿名戒酒会(AA)的出席率对许多有问题的饮酒者的戒酒率有预测作用,而且向 AA 推荐治疗也很常见。强烈鼓励参与者寻找 AA 赞助商,这也是典型的做法,而且关于 AA 中社交支持对戒酒的好处的研究结果也支持这种做法,至少是间接支持。然而,尽管这种做法很普遍,但缺乏对拥有 AA 赞助商的独特贡献进行前瞻性测试的研究。这项前瞻性研究采用了一种严格的方法学设计,该设计可以分离 AA 赞助的具体效果,从而调查了获得 AA 赞助商的贡献。参与者是从 AA 和门诊治疗中招募的。摄入和随访评估包括问卷调查、半结构化访谈和尿液毒理学筛查。资格标准将以前的治疗和 AA 历史限制在澄清相关关系的范围内,同时为了提高普遍性,使用了广泛的物质滥用标准。在 253 名参与者中,有 182 名(72%)提供了与本研究目的相关的措施的完整数据。在 12 个月内发现酒精、大麻和可卡因的使用总体减少,滞后分析表明,AA 的出席率显著预测了更高的戒酒率。在早期的 AA 参与期间,但不是在后期,逻辑回归显示,有 AA 赞助商可以预测增加酒精戒酒率以及大麻和可卡因的戒酒率,前提是首先控制了许多与 AA 相关的、治疗相关的和动机相关的措施,这些措施与 AA 暴露相关,或者通常是结果的预后因素。

相似文献

1
Is it beneficial to have an alcoholics anonymous sponsor?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Sep;24(3):397-403. doi: 10.1037/a0019013.
2
3
4
Participation in Alcoholics Anonymous and post-treatment abstinence from alcohol and other drugs.
Addict Behav. 2011 Aug;36(8):882-5. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.03.011. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
5
Sponsorship and service as mediators of the effects of Making Alcoholics Anonymous Easier (MAAEZ), a 12-step facilitation intervention.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Jul 1;116(1-3):117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.12.008. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
6
Alcoholics anonymous careers: patterns of AA involvement five years after treatment entry.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Nov;29(11):1983-90. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000187156.88588.de.
7
The persistent influence of social networks and alcoholics anonymous on abstinence.
J Stud Alcohol. 2003 Jul;64(4):579-88. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.579.
10
Do social networks explain 12-step sponsorship effects? A prospective lagged mediation analysis.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Sep;26(3):432-9. doi: 10.1037/a0025377. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

3
The Involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous Scale - Short Form: Factor Structure & Validation.
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(1):119-128. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2149245. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
4
"Can we get a Black rehabilitation center"? Factors impacting the treatment experiences of Black people who use opioids.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Nov;142:108805. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108805. Epub 2022 May 21.
6
Computational validity: using computation to translate behaviours across species.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 14;377(1844):20200525. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0525. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
7
Association of facility characteristics and substance use disorder outcomes at discharge from residential treatment.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 May;136:108664. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108664. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
9
The Validity of the Short Inventory of Problems and Drinking Intensity among Urban American Indian Adults.
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(4):501-509. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1883656. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
10

本文引用的文献

1
The role of AA sponsors: a pilot study.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2009 Jul-Aug;44(4):416-22. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agp014. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
2
Predictors of initial AA-related helping: findings from project MATCH.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Jan;70(1):117-25. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.117.
3
Services received and treatment outcomes in day-hospital and residential programs.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Oct;35(3):232-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
4
Social network variables in alcoholics anonymous: a literature review.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Mar;28(3):430-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.07.014. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
5
A 3-year study of addiction mutual-help group participation following intensive outpatient treatment.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006 Aug;30(8):1381-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00165.x.
7
Alcoholics anonymous careers: patterns of AA involvement five years after treatment entry.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Nov;29(11):1983-90. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000187156.88588.de.
8
9
Helping other alcoholics in alcoholics anonymous and drinking outcomes: findings from project MATCH.
J Stud Alcohol. 2004 Nov;65(6):766-73. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.766.
10
Social support mediates the effects of dual-focus mutual aid groups on abstinence from substance use.
Am J Community Psychol. 2004 Dec;34(3-4):175-85. doi: 10.1007/s10464-004-7413-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验