Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Sep;24(3):397-403. doi: 10.1037/a0019013.
Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) attendance is predictive of increased abstinence for many problem drinkers and treatment referral to AA is common. Strong encouragement to acquire an AA sponsor is likewise typical, and findings about the benefits associated with social support for abstinence in AA support this practice, at least indirectly. Despite this widespread practice, however, prospective tests of the unique contribution of having an AA sponsor are lacking. This prospective study investigated the contribution of acquiring an AA sponsor using a methodologically rigorous design that isolated the specific effects of AA sponsorship. Participants were recruited from AA and outpatient treatment. Intake and follow-up assessments included questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and urine toxicology screens. Eligibility criteria limited prior treatment and AA histories to clarify the relationship of interest while, for generalizability purposes, broad substance abuse criteria were used. Of the 253 participants, 182 (72%) provided complete data on measures central to the aims of this study. Overall reductions in alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use were found over 12-months and lagged analyses indicated that AA attendance significantly predicted increased abstinence. During early AA affiliation but not later logistic regressions showed that having an AA sponsor predicted increased alcohol-abstinence and abstinence from marijuana and cocaine after first controlling for a host of AA-related, treatment, and motivational measures that are associated with AA exposure or are generally prognostic of outcome.
匿名戒酒会(AA)的出席率对许多有问题的饮酒者的戒酒率有预测作用,而且向 AA 推荐治疗也很常见。强烈鼓励参与者寻找 AA 赞助商,这也是典型的做法,而且关于 AA 中社交支持对戒酒的好处的研究结果也支持这种做法,至少是间接支持。然而,尽管这种做法很普遍,但缺乏对拥有 AA 赞助商的独特贡献进行前瞻性测试的研究。这项前瞻性研究采用了一种严格的方法学设计,该设计可以分离 AA 赞助的具体效果,从而调查了获得 AA 赞助商的贡献。参与者是从 AA 和门诊治疗中招募的。摄入和随访评估包括问卷调查、半结构化访谈和尿液毒理学筛查。资格标准将以前的治疗和 AA 历史限制在澄清相关关系的范围内,同时为了提高普遍性,使用了广泛的物质滥用标准。在 253 名参与者中,有 182 名(72%)提供了与本研究目的相关的措施的完整数据。在 12 个月内发现酒精、大麻和可卡因的使用总体减少,滞后分析表明,AA 的出席率显著预测了更高的戒酒率。在早期的 AA 参与期间,但不是在后期,逻辑回归显示,有 AA 赞助商可以预测增加酒精戒酒率以及大麻和可卡因的戒酒率,前提是首先控制了许多与 AA 相关的、治疗相关的和动机相关的措施,这些措施与 AA 暴露相关,或者通常是结果的预后因素。