Department of Neurology - Stroke Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
Int J Stroke. 2010 Oct;5(5):360-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00462.x.
Lacunar infarcts may be caused by macro- or microvascular disease due to several mechanisms.
This study aims to demonstrate that retinal vascular disturbances in patients with lacunar infarcts associated with neuroimaging and ultrasound markers can help to identify small-vessel disease.
Prospective ambulatory study of patients with ischaemic stroke and a control group. A retinographic study was performed by 20° bilateral optic disc stereophotography and 50° bilateral optic fundus retinography. Microangiopathy was evaluated as the presence of nonparenchymal vascular affectation and retinopathy as at least one retinal disturbance. Ultrasonographic study evaluated carotid disorder parameters and the mean pulsatility index. The MRI protocol included T1-weighted, T2-weighted, DP-weighted and FLAIR.
We included 156 nonlacunar infarcts, 39 lacunar infarcts and 50 controls. Microangiopathy was more frequent in hypertensive (62·6% vs. 35·7%, P<0·0001) and vascular retinopathy in diabetic patients (11·7% vs. 3·8%, P=0·039). Microangiopathy (97·4% vs. 41·1%, P<0·0001) and leukoaraiosis (94·4% vs. 50·3%, P<0·0001) were more frequent and the mean pulsatility index was higher (1·9 ± 0·2 vs. 1·4 ± 0·5, P<0·0001) in patients with lacunar infarcts. Lacunar infarcts were independently associated with microangiopathy (odds ratio 12·81, 95% CI 1·52-107·86), the mean pulsatility index (odds ratio 8·13, 95% CI 1·17-56·20) and leukoaraiosis (odds ratio 3·45, 95% CI 1·09-10·93). The presence of leukoaraiosis plus microangiopathy was associated with lacunar infarcts with odds ratio 21·31 (95% CI 8·74-51·93).
The association of retinal microangiopathy (but not vascular retinopathy) and leukoaraiosis is linked to small-vessel disease and may be a useful marker of lacunar infarcts not secondary to a macrovascular lesion.
腔隙性梗死可能由多种机制引起的大血管或微血管疾病导致。
本研究旨在证明,与神经影像学和超声标志物相关的腔隙性梗死患者的视网膜血管紊乱有助于识别小血管疾病。
对缺血性脑卒中患者和对照组进行前瞻性门诊研究。通过 20°双侧视盘立体摄影和 50°双侧眼底视网膜摄影进行视网膜检查。微血管病变评估为非实质血管病变的存在和视网膜病变,即至少有一个视网膜病变。超声研究评估颈动脉病变参数和平均搏动指数。MRI 方案包括 T1 加权、T2 加权、DP 加权和 FLAIR。
我们纳入了 156 例非腔隙性梗死、39 例腔隙性梗死和 50 例对照组。高血压患者的微血管病变更为常见(62.6%比 35.7%,P<0.0001),糖尿病患者的血管性视网膜病变更为常见(11.7%比 3.8%,P=0.039)。腔隙性梗死患者的微血管病变(97.4%比 41.1%,P<0.0001)和白质疏松症(94.4%比 50.3%,P<0.0001)更为常见,平均搏动指数更高(1.9±0.2 比 1.4±0.5,P<0.0001)。腔隙性梗死与微血管病变(比值比 12.81,95%可信区间 1.52-107.86)、平均搏动指数(比值比 8.13,95%可信区间 1.17-56.20)和白质疏松症(比值比 3.45,95%可信区间 1.09-10.93)独立相关。白质疏松症加微血管病变的存在与腔隙性梗死相关,比值比为 21.31(95%可信区间 8.74-51.93)。
视网膜微血管病变(而非血管性视网膜病变)和白质疏松症的相关性与小血管疾病相关,可能是腔隙性梗死而非大血管病变的有用标志物。