Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jan;57(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
We study the incremental value of the ABCD2 score in predicting short-term risk of ischemic stroke after thorough emergency department (ED) evaluation of transient ischemic attack.
This was a prospective observational study of consecutive patients presenting to the ED with a transient ischemic attack. Patients underwent a full ED evaluation, including central nervous system and carotid artery imaging, after which ABCD2 scores and risk category were assigned. We evaluated correlations between risk categories and occurrence of subsequent ischemic stroke at 7 and 90 days.
The cohort consisted of 637 patients (47% women; mean age 73 years; SD 13 years). There were 15 strokes within 90 days after the index transient ischemic attack. At 7 days, the rate of stroke according to ABCD2 category in our cohort was 1.1% in the low-risk group, 0.3% in the intermediate-risk group, and 2.7% in the high-risk group. At 90 days, the rate of stroke in our ED cohort was 2.1% in the low-risk group, 2.1% in the intermediate-risk group, and 3.6% in the high-risk group. There was no relationship between ABCD2 score at presentation and subsequent stroke after transient ischemic attack at 7 or 90 days.
The ABCD2 score did not add incremental value beyond an ED evaluation that includes central nervous system and carotid artery imaging in the ability to risk-stratify patients with transient ischemic attack in our cohort. Practice approaches that include brain and carotid artery imaging do not benefit by the incremental addition of the ABCD2 score. In this population of transient ischemic attack patients, selected by emergency physicians for a rapid ED-based outpatient protocol that included early carotid imaging and treatment when appropriate, the rate of stroke was independent of ABCD2 stratification.
我们研究 ABCD2 评分在全面急诊评估短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)后预测短期缺血性卒中风险方面的增量价值。
这是一项连续 TIA 患者入急诊的前瞻性观察性研究。患者在急诊接受了全面的评估,包括中枢神经系统和颈动脉成像,之后进行 ABCD2 评分并确定风险类别。我们评估了风险类别与后续缺血性卒中在 7 天和 90 天的发生之间的相关性。
队列包括 637 例患者(47%为女性;平均年龄 73 岁;标准差 13 岁)。在指数 TIA 后 90 天内发生了 15 例卒中。在 7 天内,我们队列中根据 ABCD2 类别发生卒中的比率在低危组为 1.1%,中危组为 0.3%,高危组为 2.7%。在 90 天内,我们急诊队列中低危组的卒中发生率为 2.1%,中危组为 2.1%,高危组为 3.6%。在 7 天或 90 天,ABCD2 评分与 TIA 后发生的卒中之间没有关系。
ABCD2 评分在包括中枢神经系统和颈动脉成像的急诊评估之外,并未在我们队列中增加 TIA 患者风险分层的能力。包括脑和颈动脉成像的实践方法并未因 ABCD2 评分的增量而受益。在这群 TIA 患者中,经过急诊医生选择,采用快速基于急诊的门诊方案,包括早期颈动脉成像和适当的治疗,卒中的发生率与 ABCD2 分层无关。